Case law

Keith v. State

15 Ala. App. 129 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

BROWN, J. (1) No question was made on the trial against the organization of the court to try the case at the special term, and under the provisions of rule 26, circuit court practice, adopted June 23, 1913 ( 175 Ala. xix … State, 107 Ala. 64 , 18 South. 219 ; Welch v. State, 156 Ala. 117 , 46 South. 856 ; Ragland v.

Johnson v. State

42 Ala. App. 611 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1965

He first stated the Board of Stewards was the controlling body of the church. … We use “sole” because wo construe the evidence to show that the pastor undertook to disregard or distinguish the prior resolves of the Board of Stewards.

F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. Nichols

23 Ala. App. 305 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1929

V. … Brown v. Shorter, 195 Ala. 692 , 71 So. 163 ; Roach v. Wright, 195 Ala. 333 , 70 So. 271 .

McDonald v. State

21 Ala. App. 254 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1925

the sheriff of the county, that he (the sheriff) did swear out the affidavit upon which the prosecution of this appellant was based, and that he remembered the time when the defendant, Will Manning, Will Neville, and Will Brown … In the case of Moseley v. State, 99 So. 657 , 19 Ala.

Cook v. State

17 Ala. App. 611 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1920

McGehee v. State, 171 Ala. 19 , 55 So. 159 . … Vaughn v. State, ante, p. 35, 81 So. 417 .

Blancett v. Wimberley

16 Ala. App. 402 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … Broom v. Douglass, 175 Ala. 275 , 57 South. 860 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 164, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 1155; Burgin v. Sullivan, 151 Ala. 416 , 44 South. 202 ; Grove v. Yan Duyn, 44 N. J. Law, 654, 48 Am. Rep. 412 ; Bradley v.

Gatlin v. Starr Piano Co.

25 Ala. App. 95 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1932

The principle of law, governing; in this case, under the pleadings, is exactly similar to that stated in the second headnote to the report of the case of Roddam v. … Brown et al., in 201 Ala. at page 109, 77 So. 403 , to wit: “For breach of warranty of soundness of a cow sold, the purchasers were entitled to recoup in damages, in the seller’s action on their note, to the extent of the

Govan v. State

40 Ala. App. 482 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1959

Baker v. State, 19 Ala.App. 437 , 97 So. 901 ; Brown v. State, 32 Ala.App. 131 , 22 So.2d 445 ; McMurtrey v. State, 37 Ala.App. 656 , 74 So.2d 528 ; Mason v. State, 259 Ala. 438 , 66 So.2d 557 , 42 A.L.R.2d 847 . … McMurtrey v. State, supra; Mason v. State, supra.

Curlette v. State

25 Ala. App. 179 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1932

Smith v. Central of Ga. Ry., 165 Ala. 407 , 51 So. 792 . … Merrill v. Sheffield Co., 169 Ala. 242 , 53 So. 219 ; Brown v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co., 171 Ala. 310 , 55 So. 107 .

Smothers v. State

38 Ala. App. 153 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1954

In the case of Smith v. … Ross v. State, 74 Ala. 532 ; Allen v. State, 32 Ala. App. 570 , 28 So.2d 420 ; Burns v. State, 246 Ala. 135 , 19 So.2d 450 ; Segars v. State, 19 Ala.App. 407 , 97 So. 747 ; Burney v.

Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation v. Johnson

41 Ala. App. 148 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1960

Co. v. Mason, 236 Ala. 44 , 180 So. 775 ; Bankson v. Accident & Casualty Co., 244 Ala. 371 , 13 So.2d 398 . … Barber v. Martin, 240 Ala. 656 , 200 So. 787 . The failure to demur to the plea obviates our review except' only to scrutinize it to see if it sets up the substance of a cause of action known to the law;.

Mobile, M. & G. S. S. Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

22 Ala. App. 207 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1927

Co. v. McMorris, 158 Ala. 563 , 48 So. 349 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 46 ; Frazer v. W. U. Tel. Co., 84 Ala. 487 , 4 So. 831 ; Western Railway of Alabama v. Mutch, 97 Ala. 194 , 11 So. 894 , 21 L. R. A. 316, 38 Am. St. … Co. v. Westmoreland, 151 Ala. 319 , 44 So. 382 ; Buist v. Guice, 96 Ala. 255 , 11 So. 280 . There is no place in this case for the rule, “De minimis non curat lex.’’

Pate v. State

31 Ala. App. 219 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1943

Caraway v. State, 18 Ala.App. 547 , 93 So. 376 . … Cain v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., supra.

Harper v. State

16 Ala. App. 538 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1918

BROWN, P. J. The Indictment charges that the defendant on his examination as a witness, in the case of the State v. … Ev. § 194: Taylor v. State, 48 Ala. 157 ; Bradford v.

W. A. Handley Manufacturing Co. v. International Recording Co.

6 Ala. App. 219 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1912

As was said by the Supreme Court of Alabama, in the case of Sampson v. Fox, 109 Ala. 662 , 19 South, 896 , 55 Am. St. … The affairs of corporate bodies are within the exclusive control of their boards of directors, from whom authority to dispose of their assets must be derived’.” See further, Stanley & Co. v.

Doss v. State

23 Ala. App. 168 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1929

Love v. State, 16 Ala. App. 44 , 75 So. 189 ; Brown v. State, 142 Ala. 287 , 38 So. 268 ; Jackson v. State, 94 Ala. 89 , 10 So. 509 ; Meredith v. … Easterling v. State, 30 Ala. 46 ; Joseph v. Southwark F. & M. Co., 99 Ala. 47 , 10 So. 327 ; Smith v. Collins, 94 Ala. 394 , 10 So. 334 ; Pritchett v. Munroe, 22 Ala. 501 ; 38 Cyc. 1517d and 1518e.

Hargett v. State

18 Ala. App. 616 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1922

At the conclusion of the court’s oral charge defendants reserved exception to the following: “There is not any controversy but that the store was gone into by prizing up or raising up the board and putting tbe hand in and … Peck v. State, 147 Ala. 100 , 41 South. 759 ; Mathews v. State, 55 Ala. 65 , 28 Am. Rep. 698 .; Hale v. State, 122 Ala. 85 , 26 South. 236 .

Little-Cleckler Const. Co. v. L. Sonneborns Sons, Inc.

17 Ala. App. 216 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1919

BROWN, P. J. The account, the basis of tbis action, is alleged to have been contracted in the purchase of a quantity of lapidolith. … Moore v. Barber Asphalt Co., supra; 24 R. C. L. p. 192, § 463, and authorities there cited; Wren and Glover v. Wardlaw, Minor, 363, 12 Am. Dec. 60 ; Duff v. Ivy, 3 Stew. 140 ; Barnes v.

Howard v. Rhodes

17 Ala. App. 26 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … The question in Sweeney v.

Haywood v. State

43 Ala. App. 358 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1966

Moore v. State, 23 Ala.App. 432 , 127 So. 796 ; Browning v. State, 31 Ala.App. 137 , 13 So.2d 54 ; Thomas v. State, 134 Ala. 126 , 33 So. 130 . … This I take to be the essence of Brown v. State, 38 Ala. App. 312 , 82 So.2d 806 .