Case law

Melton v. State

26 Ala. App. 265 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1934

Payne v. State, 226 Ala. 69 , 145 So. 650 ; Cobb v. State, 18 Ala. App. 556 , 93 So. 225 . … Richard Brown, one of the parties present, when being examined by the state was asked if Helen Barker appeared to be friendly. Objection was sustained to this question and defendant duly excepted.

Storey v. State

14 Ala. App. 127 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1916

—Newsom v. … —Peterson v. State, 74 Ala. 34 ; Powell v. State, 5 Ala. App. 155 , 59 South. 328 ; McDaniel v. State, 13 Ala.

Green v. State

24 Ala. App. 235 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1931

Salter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 517 , 85 So. 847 ; Abrahams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 252 , 89 So. 853 ; Farley v. State, 20 Ala. App. 105 , 101 So. 69 ; Conner v. State, 20 Ala. App. 613 , 104 So. 554 ; Lockett v. … J., and Sayre and Brown, JJ., concur." It follows, therefore, that the sentence to hard labor in this case is erroneous.

Boyd v. State

37 Ala. App. 429 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1953

Storey v. State, 71 Ala. [229] 329; Brown v. State, [81] 83 Ala. 38 [33], 3 So. 857 ; Cleveland v. State, 86 Ala. 1 , 5 So. 426 ; Parker v. State, 88 Ala. 4, 6 , 7 So. 98 ; Lewis v. … State, 88 Ala. 11 , 6 So. 755 ; Kirby v. State, 89 Ala. [63, 8 So. 110 ]; Watson v. State, 82 Ala. 10 , 2 So. 455 ; *431 Dolan v. State, 81 Ala. 11 , 1 So. 707; State v. Harman, 78 N.C. 515 .”

Motes v. State

20 Ala. App. 195 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1924

Carr v. State, 17 Ala. App. 539 , 85 South. 852 . Refused charge 6 is an exact copy of charge 9 in the case of Brown v. State, 118 Ala. 111 , 23 South. 81 . … Acts 1915, p. 732; Britton v. State, 15 Ala. App. 584 , 74 South. 721 . For the error designated, the judgment of conviction appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Holt v. State

16 Ala. App. 399 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1918

BROWN, P. J. Before the case was submitted to the jury, the solicitor nolle prossed all the counts in the indictment except the second and seventh. … Davis v. State, 141 Ala. 84 , 37 South. 454 , 109 Am. St. Rep. 19 ; Wester v. State, 147 Ala. 121 , 41 South. 969 ; Eubanks v. State, 17 Ala. 181 ; Pettibone v. State, 19 Ala. 586 ; Skains & Lewis v.

Mobile, M. & G. S. S. Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

22 Ala. App. 207 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1927

Co. v. McMorris, 158 Ala. 563 , 48 So. 349 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 46 ; Frazer v. W. U. Tel. Co., 84 Ala. 487 , 4 So. 831 ; Western Railway of Alabama v. Mutch, 97 Ala. 194 , 11 So. 894 , 21 L. R. A. 316, 38 Am. St. … Co. v. Westmoreland, 151 Ala. 319 , 44 So. 382 ; Buist v. Guice, 96 Ala. 255 , 11 So. 280 . There is no place in this case for the rule, “De minimis non curat lex.’’

Jones v. Martin

15 Ala. App. 675 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917

BROWN, P. … Bank v. Johnson, 90 Ala. 549 , 8 South. 42 ; Ala. *678 Nat. Bank v. Parker & Co., 146 Ala. 513 , 40 South. 987 ; Whitehead v. Coker, 76 South. 484 ; Birmingham Savings Co. v.

Rowe v. State

20 Ala. App. 119 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1924

In Cross v. State, 68 Ala. 476 , the Supreme Ooqrt quoted with warm approval an extract from an opinion by Ryan, C. J., of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in the case of Brown v. Swineford, 44 Wis. 282 , 28 Am.

Traylor v. State

20 Ala. App. 262 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1924

We cannot so hold under the following au *263 thorities: Gilbert v. State, 2 Ala. App. 95 , 57 So. 127 ; Scott v. State, 3 Ala. App. 150 , 57 So. 413 ; Brown v. City of Tuscaloosa, 12 Ala. … App. 609 , 67 So. 780 ; Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 394 , 69 So. 379 ; Gilbert v. State, 18 Ala. App. 393 , 92 So. 522 ; Lutz v. V. H. Brokerage Co., 202 Ala. 234 , 80 So. 72 .

Mazett v. State

11 Ala. App. 317 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1914

BROWN, J. … As said by the court in the case of Emmonds v.

Herrmann v. Mobile County

16 Ala. App. 634 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1918

(3) Is- the itemized and verified claim, which is Exhibit A to the complaint a sufficient compliance with the requirements relative to the presentation to the board of revenue and road commissioners of claims against the … The first, two of these questions have been answered in accordance with the contention of the appellant in the case of Herrmann v. Mobile County, 80 South. 112 , by Thomas, J.

Birmingham Motor Co. v. Norwood Transp. Co.

16 Ala. App. 572 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1918

BROWN, P. … Evans v. Sanders, 8 Port. 497 , 33 Am. Dec. 297 , 6 R. C. L. p. 854, § 242.

Hampton v. Tant

15 Ala. App. 463 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1917

BROWN, J. The plaintiff, appellant here, claimed title to the property sued for through a mortgage, and the defense was that the mortgage debt had been paid. … State, infra, 73 South. 824 ; Tinney v. C. of Ga. Ry. Co., 129 Ala. 525 , 30 South. 623 . No error appearing on the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Allgood v. Parker

21 Ala. App. 273 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1926

Sess. 1909, pp. 165, 166, and section 2412, and considered in the case of Lovelady v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb, 68 So. 48 , 191 Ala. 96 . … See Turner v. Anniston Elec. & Gas Co., 75 So. 465 , 200 Ala. 89 ; Board of Rev. v. Sou. Bell T. & T. Co., 76 So. 858 , 200 Ala. 532 . Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cook v. State

17 Ala. App. 611 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1920

McGehee v. State, 171 Ala. 19 , 55 So. 159 . … Vaughn v. State, ante, p. 35, 81 So. 417 .

Kelley v. State

30 Ala. App. 21 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1941

According to the opinion written for this court by the then Presiding Judge Brown,— who is now, by the way, an Associate Justice of our Supreme Court — in the case of Pool v. … Pool v. State, supra.

Blancett v. Wimberley

16 Ala. App. 402 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … Broom v. Douglass, 175 Ala. 275 , 57 South. 860 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 164, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 1155; Burgin v. Sullivan, 151 Ala. 416 , 44 South. 202 ; Grove v. Yan Duyn, 44 N. J. Law, 654, 48 Am. Rep. 412 ; Bradley v.

Elmore v. State

15 Ala. App. 65 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1916

BROWN, J. — The defendant was jointly indicted with Lige Washington for the larceny of a bale of cotton, the property of Ellen Smith, demanded a severance, was tried and convicted. … State, 89 Ala. 134 , 18 South. 104 ; Rhodes v.

Curlette v. State

25 Ala. App. 179 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1932

Smith v. Central of Ga. Ry., 165 Ala. 407 , 51 So. 792 . … Merrill v. Sheffield Co., 169 Ala. 242 , 53 So. 219 ; Brown v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co., 171 Ala. 310 , 55 So. 107 .