Case law

Williams v. State

480 So. 2d 1265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 12, 1985

Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , ___, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In Strickland v. … As stated in Strickland v.

Kitsos v. State

574 So. 2d 979 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 21, 1990

Even after the adoption of Rule 51, § 12-16-13 continued to apply in criminal cases, Brown v. State , 339 So.2d 125 , 126 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); St. John v. State , 55 Ala. … See Kelley v. State , 409 So.2d 909 , 915 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981); Brown v. State , 401 So.2d 213 , 218 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1981).

Ware v. State

584 So. 2d 939 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 11, 1991

United States v. Brown , 899 F.2d 189 , 192 (2d Cir. 1990) (comparing 18 U.S.C. § 17 (a) to the predecessor defense recognized in federal courts). … See United States v. Brown , 899 F.2d at 192 ; United States v. Cameron , 907 F.2d at 1061 . While the new § 13A-3-1 (a) contains only the "cognitive" test, the defendant must make a two-part showing to meet this test.

Firth v. State

493 So. 2d 397 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 28, 1986

George Crozier, the director of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab, testified about a study conducted by the Coastal Area Board. … Hicks v. Wainwright , 633 F.2d 1146 (5th Cir. 1981); Singleton v. Lefkowitz , 583 F.2d 618 (2d Cir. 1978).

Scott v. State

473 So. 2d 1167 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 14, 1985

Brown that we would officially make their cooperation known to you. We also advised Mr. Brown that the Scotts would not be prosecuted for possible federal charges arising from their testimony. ". . . . … In State v.

Andrews v. State

975 So. 2d 392 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 2, 2007

In Morrissey v. … See Law v. State , 778 So.2d 249 (Ala.Crim.App. 2000).

Perry v. State

494 So. 2d 160 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 7, 1986

The yardstick by which probation revocation proceedings must be measured is established by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Our own Supreme Court, in Armstrong v. … We are obliged to apply the somewhat mechanistic requirement of Morrisey v. Brewer, supra, and Armstrong v. State, supra, that the reasons for revocation be set out.

Davidson v. State

792 So. 2d 1153 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 28, 1998

Cole v. State, 548 So.2d 1093 (Ala.Cr.App.1989); Woods v. … LONG, P.J., and BROWN and BASCHAB, JJ„ concur. COBB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion. .

Akin v. State

668 So. 2d 74 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 13, 1995

Brown did. But you did. … Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).

Wilbanks v. State

48 Ala. App. 549 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 26, 1971

State, 68 Ala. 476, 484 , in quoting from the Wisconsin case of Brown v. … Rollings v. State, 160 Ala. 82 , 49 So. 329, 332 ; Browning v. State, 31 Ala.App. 137 , 13 So.2d 54 ; Dyson v. State, 26 Miss. 362 . VII We find no error in overruling objection to Dr.

Browning v. State

549 So. 2d 548 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 31, 1989

Browning, was convicted of trafficking in marijuana, in violation of § 20-2-80 , Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment. The appellant raises three issues on appeal. … As Judge Patterson stated in Hallford v.

Horton v. State

56 Ala. App. 548 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 9, 1975

Davis v. State, 49 Ala.App. 587 , 274 So.2d 360 ; Carroll v. State, 36 Ala.App. 59 , 52 So.2d 171 ; Cross v. State, 68 Ala. 476 . … In Brown v.

State v. AJ

877 So. 2d 635 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 10, 2003

v. … "In Clemmons v.

Spradley v. State

414 So. 2d 170 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 18, 1982

Oliver v. State , 385 So.2d 69 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980); Travis v. State , 381 So.2d 97 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Travis , 381 So.2d 102 (Ala. 1979); Campbell v. State , 354 So.2d 325 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977); Herrin v. … McNamara v. State , 357 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1978); Neely v. State , 402 So.2d 477 (Fla.App. 1981); Brown v. State , 358 So.2d 596 (Fla.App. 1978).

McElemore v. State

798 So. 2d 693 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 31, 2000

"In Clark v. … Ex parte Brown , 686 So.2d 409 , 416-17 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1199 , 117 S.Ct. 1558 , 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997). Moreover, in Slappy v.

Mauldin v. State

402 So. 2d 1106 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 4, 1981

Hester Smith, containing an Easter card "37 plastic bindles (packages) of white powder contained in a plastic baggie and wrapped with brown paper and a rubberband "A note addressed to `Tony' was also in the package "Mr. … Lynn v. State , 380 So.2d 366 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980); Murrell v. State , 377 So.2d 1102 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 377 So.2d 1108 (Ala. 1979); Williford v.

Walls v. State

711 So. 2d 485 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 11, 1996

State v. … The Missouri Supreme Court in State v. Brown also held that it was proper to admit items seized pursuant to a search warrant, even assuming that it was an invalid anticipatory warrant.

Chenault v. State

777 So. 2d 314 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jun 30, 2000

Allen v. State, 644 So.2d 45 , 46 (Ala.Crim.App. 1994) (quoting Armstrong v. State, 445 So.2d 573 , 574-575 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984)); Thompson v. State, 356 So.2d 757 (Ala.Crim.App. 1978); Goodrum v. … Peak maintains that the drug test was issued by the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and that the same test was administered statewide.

Kelly v. State

455 So. 2d 1016 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 28, 1984

Fielding v. State, 409 So.2d 964 (Ala.Cr.App.1981); Washington v. State, 405 So.2d 62 (Ala.Cr. App.1981). “2. … Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Williams v. Davis, Ala., 386 So.2d 415 (1980). II.

Henderson v. State

933 So. 2d 395 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 29, 2004

him, an opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and to cross-examine adverse witnesses, a neutral and detached hearing body such as a traditional parole board … See Armstrong v. State , 294 Ala. 100 , 312 So.2d 620 (1975); Hernandez v. State , 673 So.2d 477 (Ala.Cr.App. 1995)." In Law v.