Case law

Brannon v. Policemen & Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund Board

539 So. 2d 277 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 21, 1988

The Personnel Board, subsequent to the passage of this Act, merely increased the number of pay steps from seven to ten. But, most relevant to the inquiry here is what the Board did not do when it revised the plan. … State v. AAA Motor Lines, Inc., 275 Ala. 405 , 155 So.2d 509 (1963).

Mary Ann Wilkinson v. Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama.

102 So. 3d 362 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 1, 2011

“In Newman v. … The Board relies on language quoted in Staudt, 388 So.2d at 993-94 , which first appeared in White v.

Water Works Board of Birmingham v. Alabama Surface Mining Commission

156 So. 3d 412 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 20, 2014

State v. Union Tank Car Co., 281 Ala. 246, 248 , 201 So.2d 402, 403 (1967). … Bd. v.

City of Jasper v. Civil Service Board of Jasper

677 So. 2d 761 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 13, 1995

Board of Dental Examiners v. King, 364 So.2d 311 (Ala.Civ.App.1977), rev’d on other grounds, Ex parte King, 364 So.2d 318 (Ala.1978), on remand, Board of Dental Examiners v. King, 364 So.2d 319 (Ala.Civ.App.1978). … Board of Dental Examiners v. King at 317.

Board of Zoning Adjustment of the Trussville v. Tacala, Inc.

142 So. 3d 624 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 12, 2013

Advertiser Co. v. Hobbie, supra; Morgan County Board of Education v. Alabama Public School & College Authority, 362 So.2d 850 (Ala.1978). … Austin v.

DIRECTOR OF STATE DEPT. OF IND. REL. v. Nolin

374 So. 2d 903 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 12, 1979

Quick v. Utotem of Alabama, Inc. , 365 So.2d 1245 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). … See, e.g., Scott v. Nevada Employment Security Department , 70 Nev. 555 , 278 P.2d 602 (1954); Hansen v. Division of Employment Security , 520 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App. 1975); Brown v.

McCaughn v. Ala. State Brd. for Reg., 2091122 (ala.civ.app. 1-14-2011)

85 So. 3d 392 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 14, 2011

Brown, who is employed by NCARB as its “Director, Architect Registration Examination.” … Brown’s affidavit indicated that the Board had contracted with NCARB and that NCARB was authorized by the Board: (1) to administer the Architect Registration Examination (“ARE”), an examination developed by NCARB; (2) to

State Tenure Commission v. Birmingham Board of Education

555 So. 2d 1075 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 8, 1989

Jefferson County Board of Equalization & Adjustments v. Chichester

586 So. 2d 921 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 21, 1991

McMullin v. AmSouth Bank, 512 So.2d 1382 (Ala.Civ.App.1987). … Ensminger v. White, 507 So.2d 527 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Cooper v. Board of Equalization of Madison County, 392 So.2d 244 (Ala.Civ.App.1980).

Birmingham Realty Co. v. Jefferson County Board of Equalization

669 So. 2d 956 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 20, 1995

The Act provides that a taxpayer may appeal to the circuit court the decision of the Jefferson County Board of Equalization and Adjustment (Board) regarding the assessed value of real property. … Nobis v. State, 401 So.2d 191 (Ala.Crim.App.1981). In any event, in view of the above, the judgment of the circuit court is due to be affirmed. The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge RICHARD L.

E.E. v. Limestone Cnty. Bd. of Education (In re Limestone Cnty. Bd. of Educ.)

272 So. 3d 1103 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 14, 2018

Primm v. Alabama State Tenure Commission

365 So. 2d 73 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 6, 1978

In Brown v. … See Board of Education of Marshall County v. Baugh.

City of Jasper Civil Service Board v. Schultz

426 So. 2d 845 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 2, 1983

The appellee then appealed that decision to the city’s civil service board. After a hearing the board upheld the discharge. The appellee appealed to the circuit court. … This court in City of Jasper Civil Service Board v. Schultz, 412 So.2d 818 (Ala.Civ.App.1982), ruled that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter the September 2 order.

Marchetti v. Alabama Board of Examiners in Psychology

494 So. 2d 448 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 16, 1986

Employees’ Retirement System v. Oden, 369 So.2d 4, 7 (Ala.1979). Such is precisely what the legislature did with regard to the licensing of psychologists. … See Hartzell v. State Board of Examiners in Psychology, 274 S.C. 502 , 265 S.E.2d 265 (1980). But cf. United Chiropractors of Washington, Inc. v. State, 90 Wash.2d 1 , 578 P.2d 38 (1978).

Hayes v. Mobile County Board of School Commissioners

405 So. 2d 372 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 30, 1981

Jones v. Jefferson County Board of Zoning Adjustments

462 So. 2d 381 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 21, 1984

The issues presented are the same as those presented in Swann v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jefferson County, Alabama, 459 So.2d 896 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).

Blood Bros. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

386 So. 2d 223 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 9, 1980

Eskridge v. Marengo County Board of Equalization

46 Ala. App. 319 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 18, 1970

Co. v. State, 141 Ala. 103 , 37 So. 433 ; Ladd v. Ladd, 121 Ala. 583, 585 , 25 So. 627 ; State v. Brintle, 207 Ala. 500 , 93 So. 429 ; Stovall v. City of Jasper, 215 Ala. 300 , 110 So. 317 . … Co. v. Harmon, 228 Ala. 377 , 153 So. 755 ; Pollard v. Treadwell, 234 Ala. 615 , 176 So. 452 ; Rountree Farm Co. v. Morgan County, 249 Ala. 472 , 31 So.2d 346 .

Petroleum Equipment Tool Co. v. State Board of Health

575 So. 2d 587 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 9, 1991

Petroleum Equipment Tool Co. v. State Board of Health, 567 So.2d 328 (Ala.Civ.App.1990). … Churchill v. Board of Trustees, 409 So.2d 1382 (Ala.1982). Here, the merits of the Board’s claim related only to the immediate cleanup of the site.

Board of Registration of Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. Atkinson

493 So. 2d 989 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 15, 1985

From this judgment, the Board appeals. The Board contends that the circuit court erred in finding that the documents filed with the Board were “charges” within the meaning of § 34-ll-ll(d). … Ferguson v. Hamrick, 388 So.2d 981 (Ala.1980).