Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersala

10,000+ results

3.42s

  • Churchill v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.

    409 So. 2d 1382 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1982

    CHURCHILL, et al. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN BIRMINGHAM, et al., etc. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN BIRMINGHAM, et al., etc. v. Faye M. CHURCHILL, et al. 80-601, 80-601A. … Also referenced is the case of Iowa Hotel Assoc. v. State Board of Regents, 253 Iowa 870 , 114 N.W.2d 539 (Iowa 1962).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Alabama State Personnel Board v. Miller

    66 So. 3d 764 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 14, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ALABAMA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ASSN, INC. v. Brown

    65 So. 3d 493 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 14, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Brown

    392 So. 2d 1266 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 30, 1981

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • State Board of Education v. Mullins

    31 So. 3d 91 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 4, 2009

    See, e.g., Clayton v. … See Haas v. Madison County Board of Education, 380 So.2d 873 (Ala.Civ.App.1980), cert. denied, 380 So.2d 877 (Ala.1980).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Crow v. Board of School Com'rs

    228 Ala. 107 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 14, 1933

    *110 BROWN, Justice. … East et al. v. Eichelberger, 69 Ala. 187 ; Stewart v. Sample, 168 Ala. 270 , 53 So. 182 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Cosmetological Examiners v. Gibbons

    238 Ala. 612 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 11, 1940

    The Act creates a Board of Cosmeto-logical Examiners, empowered to license schools of Cosmetology, to conduct examinations of applicants for license to engage in any or all the branches of Cosmetology defined in A to D of … In State v. Woodall, supra, this legislation is sustained in the interest of public health and welfare upon like principles as barber shop statutes, sustained in several states. Cooper v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alabama State Personnel Board v. Hardy

    27 So. 3d 557 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 17, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of School Commissioners v. Dunn

    962 So. 2d 814 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 5, 2007

    Board of Sch. Comm’rs of Mobile County v. Dunn, 962 So.2d 805 (Ala.Civ.App.2006). Dunn petitioned this Court for certiorari review. … See Alabama Dep’t of Human Res. v. Dye, 921 So.2d [421, 426 (Ala.Civ.App.2005) (quoting Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC, 373 F.3d [372, 389 (3d Cir.2004) ](quoting in turn Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Brown

    401 So. 2d 218 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 24, 1981

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Buchanon v. City Board of Education

    288 Ala. 474 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 11, 1972

    Named as defendants were the City Board of Education of Cullman, the *475 State Examiners of Public Accounts, the Superintendent of Education of the Cull-man City Schools, the City Council of Cullman, and the AEA (Alabama … Mason v. McClain, 271 Ala. 93 , 122 So.2d 519 ; Box v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 232 Ala. 1 , 168 So. 216 ; Bass v. City of Enterprise, 286 Ala. 522 , . 243 So.2d 359 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vincent v. County Board of Education

    222 Ala. 216 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1931

    And in Bryant v. Whisenant, 167 Ala. 325 , 52 So. 525 , 140 Am. St. Rep. 41 , and again in Kennedy v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • County Board of Education v. State

    239 Ala. 276 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 21, 1940

    Board of Education, 235 Ala. 388 , 179 So. 197 , and on January 31, 1939, in Board of Education of Jefferson County v. State Tax Commission, 237 Ala. 434 , 187 So. 414 . … Murphy v. Andrews, 13 Ala. 708 . The judgment of the circuit court, as corrected, is affirmed. Affirmed with correction. ANDERSON, C. J., ánd BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mack v. Wilcox County Board of Education

    218 So. 3d 774 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 2, 2016

    See Board of Sch. Comm’rs of Mobile Cty. v. … See also Poiroux v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Brown

    581 So. 2d 436 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1991

    Code 1975, § 12-16-11 ; Williams v. State , 520 So.2d 179 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987); Jones v. State , 488 So.2d 48 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Pease v. City of Montgomery , 333 So.2d 221 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976). … Moreover, the charge was effectively a general affirmative charge, which stated, in effect, that if the jury believed the State's evidence, then it should convict Brown. See, e.g., Austin v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Alabama State Milk Control Board v. Graham

    250 Ala. 49 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 18, 1947

    Franklin v. State ex rel. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 232 Ala. 637 , 169 So. 295 ; Taylor v. State, 237 Ala. 178 , 186 So. 463 ; Thompson v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 241 Ala. 100 , 1 So.2d 381 . … Donoghue v. Bunkley, 247 Ala. 423 , 25 So. 2d 61 ; Morgan v. Board of School Com’rs. of Mobile County, 248 Ala. 22 , 26 So.2d 108 .

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Highsmith v. Brown Service Funeral Co.

    236 Ala. 249 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 9, 1938

    Brassell v. … Perkins v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Lehmann v. State Board of Public Accountancy

    208 Ala. 185 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 29, 1922

    Parke v. Bradley, 204 Ala. 455 , 86 South. 28 ; Railroad Commission v. A. N. Railway Co., 182 Ala. 357 , 62 South. 740 . … Ewing v. St. Louis, 5 Wall. 413 , 18 L. Ed. 657 ; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 , 23 Sup. Ct. 390, 47 L. Ed. 563 .

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Cannon v. Alabaster Water & Gas Board

    508 So. 2d 222 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 27, 1987

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kimmons v. Jefferson County Board of Education

    204 Ala. 384 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 1920

    Ballentyne v. … Lott v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.