Case law

Brown v. Billy Marlar Chevrolet, Inc.

381 So. 2d 191 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 14, 1980

Jury List Challenge Because Brown waited until after the trial to challenge the master jury list, we hold that, under the facts of this case, he has now waived that right. This Court held in Williams v. … Fulwider v. Jacob , 221 Ala. 124 , 127 So. 818 (1930). Without setting it out, the evidence clearly shows that Brown's counsel, with due diligence, could have found out how the master jury list was compiled.

Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. Brown

128 Ala. 462 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1900

Asso. v. Anniston Loan & Trust Co. 101 Ala. 582 ; Sheldon v. Birmingham B. & L. Asso., 121 Ala. 278 ; Johnson v. B. & L. Asso. 126 Ala. 672 . … derives its powers from another State does not affect the question since the right of foreign associations of this character to do business here upon compliance with the conditions prescribed by law is recognized. — Eslava v.

Brown v. National Motor Fleets, Inc.

276 Ala. 493 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 13, 1964

.— Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co., 84 Colo. 138, 139 , 268 P. 976 (1928); City of Sioux Falls v. Collins, 43 S.D. 311 , 178 N.W. 950 (1920); People v. … We think the cases of State v. Hotz GMC Trucks, Inc., 268 Ala. 120 , 105 So.2d 98 , and Haden v.

Brown Service Ins. Co. v. King

247 Ala. 311 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 27, 1945

Co. v. Litke, 181 Misc. 32 , 45 N.Y.S.2d 576 . In Hunt v. … J., and BROWN and SIMPSON, JJ, concur.

Brown, Toler & Phillips v. Hurt & Bro.

31 Ala. 146 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1857

. — Blount v. Traylor, 4 Ala. 667 ; Harrell v. Floyd, 3 Ala. 16 ; Huff v. Cox, 2 Ala. 310 ; Fryer v. Dennis, ib. 144; Bettis v. Taylor, 8 Porter, 564 . *148 2. The case of Chambers v. … There is nothing opposed to the foregoing views in Brown v. Higginbottom, 19 Ala. 207 .

United Companies Fin. Corp. v. Brown

584 So. 2d 470 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 21, 1991

They cite Danley v. … They also cite Herrington v. Central Soya Co. , 420 So.2d 1 (Ala. 1982). In response, Brown and Holcombe cite Brindley Construction Co. v.

Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Brown

294 Ala. 242 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 22, 1975

At time of filing of this action the Browns were in possession. These facts were developed by plaintiff, Mid-State, after which it rested. A prima facie case was thereby made. Atlas Subsidiaries of Florida. Inc. v. … McKay v. Lunsford, 234 Ala. 180 , 174 So. 620 ; Shelley v. Murphy, 234 Ala. 311 , 174 So. 506 ; Newell v. Armstrong, 230 Ala. 367 , 161 So. 244 ; Aiken v. McMillan, 213 Ala. 494 , 106 So. 150 .

Brown v. Supreme Lodge, K. P.

225 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 2, 1932

The suit is upon a life insurance policy issued in May, 1927, on the life of Eugene Brown, who died in October, 1927. … Co. v.

Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc. v. Harper

76 So. 3d 870 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 2010

76 So.3d 870 (2010) BROWN STAGNER RICHARDSON, INC. v. ROLFE C. HARPER III. No. 1071606. Supreme Court of Alabama. January 15, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. Branch Bank at Montgomery

20 Ala. 420 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1852

Blackstone 1190; 7 Metc. 247 ; 9 John. 259 ; 9 Wendell 431 ; 6 Hill 247 ; McDougald v. Reid et al., 5 Ala. 810 ; Mabry, Giller & Walker v. Herndon, 8 Ala., 849 ; Cogburn & Powell v. Spence & Elliott, 15 Ala. 549 . … If the creditor moves, he may arrest his action by interposing his certificate, but he should not be allowed to do more .The case of Kemp & Buckey v.

Garland v. Board of Revenue

87 Ala. 223 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1888

In reference to a similar clause in the Constitution of Ohio, it was said in Walker v. … Jarrett v. City of Moberly, 5 Dillon, 253; s. c., 103 U. S. 580 ; Wyscaver v. Atkinson, 37 Ohio St. 80 .

Brown v. Jim Walter Res., Inc.

47 So. 3d 291 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 2009

Board of Commissioners v. Orr.

181 Ala. 308 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1913

To the same unquestionable effect are Old Dominion Telegraph Co. v. Powers, 140 Ala. 220 , 37 South. 195 , 1 Ann. Cas. 119, and other cases cited there and in Brown v. Birmingham, supra. … This situation of the complainant, we think, also takes his case without the controlling influence of Brown v. Birmingham and Old Dominion Telegraph Co. v.

JIM BROWN PROPS., INC. v. Whalen

47 So. 3d 292 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 13, 2009

Jebeles & Colias Conf. Co. v. Brown

147 Ala. 593 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 5, 1906

In the later case of Pfeifer v. … Webb, 68 Ala. 393 ; Gilmer v. M. & M. Railway, 79 Ala. 569 , 58 Am. Rep. 623 ; M. & M. Ry. v.

Caldwell v. Brown Serv. Funeral Home

345 So. 2d 1341 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 6, 1977

Berry v. Druid City Hosp. Bd. , 333 So.2d 796 (Ala. 1976) (citations omitted). … Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc. , 293 Ala. 686 , 309 So.2d 818 (1975). REVERSED AND REMANDED. TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Board of Revenue v. Merrill

193 Ala. 521 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 23, 1915

Though done at adjourned terms the acts of the board have the same validity as. if done on the day of the regular meetings prescribed by law. — Hays v. Ahlrichs, supra; Ashford v. … Ed. 861 ; State v. Voorhies, 37 La. Ann. 605 ; Ex parte Hollis, 59 Cal. 406 ; Ex parte Brown, 97 Cal. 83 , 31 Pac. 840 ; Dodd v. Una, 40 N. J. Eq. 672, 5 Atl. 155 ; Forrest v. Price, 52 N. J.

Board of Revenue v. Crow

141 Ala. 126 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

State v. Buckley’s Distributees, 54 Ala. 599 ; Ex parte Howard-Harrison Iron do., 119 Ala. 484 ; Browning v. Powers, (Mo. Sup.) 88 S. W. 943 . … It is claimed for appellants.that- the. case of Abernathy v. State, 78 Ala. 411 , has a bearing on the question here favorable to their1 position.

Board of Revenue v. Huey

195 Ala. 83 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 13, 1916

“Courthouse” and “county site” had been held to be synonymous, and to signify “seat of government.” — Matkin v. Marengo County, 137 Ala. 155, 164, 165 , 34 South. 171 ; Bank of Lafayette v. McNaron, supra. … As was noted in the second Matkin Appeal, supra, and re-noted in Bank of Lafayette v.

Brown v. Flying Wheels Motorcross Club

569 So. 2d 313 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 22, 1990

Norwood Clinic, Inc. v. Spann , 240 Ala. 427 , 199 So. 840 (1941). Another permissible use may occur where such evidence is offered to establish a condition existing at the time of the accident. Leeth v. … Holland v. First National Bank of Brewton , 519 So.2d 460 , 462 (Ala. 1987).