Case law

Birmingham Water Works Co. v. Brown

191 Ala. 457 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 17, 1914

.— Brown v. Birmingham Waterworks Company, 169 Ala. 230 , 52 South. 915 . … It follows, therefore, that the opinion of this court on the former appeal (Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Brown

211 Ala. 266 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1924

Wooster v. State, 55 Ala. 217 ; Sparks v. State, 59 Ala. 82 ; Toney v. State, 60 Ala. 97 ; Ramsey v. Smith, 138 Ala. 333 , 35 South. 325 . … Zeigler v. S. & N. A. R. R. Co., 58 Ala. 594, 599 ; Doe v. Minge, 56 Ala. 121, 125 ; Stoudenmire v. Brown, 48 Ala. 699 ; State v. Haberle, 72 Iowa, 138 , 33 N. W. 461 ; State v. Wilson, 124 Iowa, 264 , 99 N. W. 1060 .

Baker v. Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc.

272 Ala. 101 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 6, 1961

Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc., v. Baker, supra; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Porterfield, 239 Ala. 148 , 194 So. 173 ; American Dist. Tel. Co. v. Roberts & Son, 219 Ala. 595 , 122 So. 837 ; McKinney v. … Accordingly appellant argues that it follows that under both the decision in Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc., v. Baker, supra, and Armi v.

Brown Shoe Co. v. Rowell

237 Ala. 404 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 16, 1939

Bank of Montgomery v. Ohio Buggy Co., 100 Ala. 626 , 13 So. 621 ; Dicks v. … See, Norton v. Clayton Hardware Co., 149 Ala. 248 , 43 So. 185 . The reference in section 7670, Code, is. to separate, independent compromises, without mutuality among the creditors.

Alabama Iron Works v. Hurley & Brown

86 Ala. 217 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1888

Co., 69 Ala. 111, 118-9; Daughtery v. Amer. Tel. Co., 75 Ala. 168 . … Eor that reason, if for no other, they were rightly refused. — Bell v. Reynolds, 78 Ala. 511 . There is nothing in any of the questions raised. Affirmed.

Johnson v. Brown-Service Insurance Co.

293 Ala. 549 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 5, 1974

Title 7, § 146, Code; Foster v. Napier, 73 Ala. 595 (1883); Sessions v. Jack Cole Co., 276 Ala. 10 , 158 So.2d 652 (1963). … Had Brown Service and Liberty National attempted to get the second suit in federal court abated, they would have failed. The federal rule is summarized in Ermentrout v.

Brown v. City of Mobile

578 So. 2d 1251 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 19, 1991

The Browns purchased that house in 1979. They apparently had planned to renovate the house and leave it to their son. This house was one of a number of older properties that the Browns owned. … The Browns did not attend this hearing and did not send a representative.

Brown v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.

255 Ala. 308 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 15, 1951

This is a suit by Lillian Davy Brown, as administratrix of the estate of her father,. Clarence Vincent (Jack) Davy, against Southeastern Greyhound Lines, a corporation, and David Eugene Ross. … Pulliam v. Schimpf, 109 Ala. 179 , 19 So. 428 ; Wilson Bros. v. Mobile & O. R. Co., 208 Ala. 581 , 94 So. 721 ; Brothers v. Norris, 209 Ala. 426 , 96 So. 328 ; Roll v.

Brown v. Gay-Padgett Hardware Co.

186 Ala. 561 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 23, 1914

The case of Wyker v. Francis, 120 Ala. 509 , 24 South. 895 , relied upon by Justice McClellan, is readily distinguishable from Norwood v. Goldsmith, and the cases there followed. Wyker v. … The petitioner should have been remitted to its summary action under the statute, as was done in the cases of Norwood v. Goldsmith, supra, Hines v. Salter, supra, and Arrington v. Van Houton, supra.

Brown v. AAA Wood Products, Inc.

380 So. 2d 784 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 22, 1980

In Sharp v. … Williams v. Pope , 281 Ala. 382 , 203 So.2d 105 (1967); Hamilton v. Browning , 257 Ala. 72 , 57 So.2d 530 (1952); King v. Brindley , 255 Ala. 425 , 51 So.2d 870 (1951).

Brown Plumbing & Heating Co. v. McDowell

240 Ala. 485 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 23, 1941

State, 1898, 117 Ala. 174 , 23 So. 676 , sale of cigarettes at two or more separate and distinct places; Browne v. Mobile, 122 *489 Ala. 159, 25 So. 223 , vehicle taxes of classes employed; Gambill v. … Cooper, 1897, 99 Tenn. 472 , 42 S.W. 687 , mercantile business and cigar stand; Hill Co. v. Whitice, 1924, 149 Tenn. 168 , 258 S.W. 407 , retail merchant and rolling store; State Board of Examiners v. Standard Engr.

Roberts Construction Company v. Brown

272 Ala. 440 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 25, 1961

In 6 Div. 446 the suit was brought by Thelma Alice Brown, 6 years old, suing by her father and next friend, Hugh W. Brown, Jr., to recover damages for her personal injuries. In 6 Div. 445 , Hugh W. … Co. v.

Ingram Realty Co. v. Brown

208 Ala. 455 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 16, 1922

Moss v. King, 186 Ala. 475 , 65 South. 180 .

Brown v. Western Railway of Alabama

276 Ala. 66 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 20, 1963

Appellant, Charlie Brown, as administrator of the estate of Willie Junior Brown, deceased, brought suit in the circuit court of Lee County against appellee, Western Railway of Alabama, to recover damages for the alleged wrongful … Of this in Meeks v. Southern Ry.

Brown v. Birmingham Water Works Co.

169 Ala. 230 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 29, 1910

Ferguson v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., 163 Ala. 586 , 51 South. 354 , in construing the said contract between the city of Birmingham and the defend ant in this case. … . — Christian & Craft Grocery Co. v. Bienville Water Company, 106 Ala. 127 , 17 South. 352 . Reversed and remanded. 'Dowdeüb, C. J., and Anderson, and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Dixie Highway Express, Inc.

270 Ala. 46 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 29, 1959

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County in favor of the defendant tax payer in an action brought by Brown, as Director of Revenue of Jefferson County, seeking to recover of the

State ex rel. Brown v. Slaughter

196 Ala. 428 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 23, 1916

Section 1 of the act of 1915 (Local Acts, p. 394), creating a board of revenue for Monroe county, etc., merely creates a board of revenue in lieu of county commissioners, prescribes the duties thereof, and provides for the

Brown v. Allied Steel Products Corporation

273 Ala. 184 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 18, 1962

The deed to the Board was signed by appellant Zula Miller. The other two appellants are Coy Brown and his wife Thelma, who is a sister of Mrs. Zula Miller. … When the Board deeded the property to appellee, Coy Brown was a member thereof, and he and his wife signed the deed to appellee. At Mrs.

Harper v. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc.

845 So. 2d 777 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 6, 2002

HARPER III v. BROWN, STAGNER, RICHARDSON, INC. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc. v. Rolfe C. Harper III. 1011109 and 1011205. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 6, 2002. *778 Paul V. Lagarde and James H. … The jury returned a verdict in favor of [Brown] and awarded damages of $113,115.34. The trial court entered a judgment on that verdict." Harper Sales Co. v.

WHEELER, LACEY & BROWN, INC. v. Baker

269 Ala. 293 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 28, 1959

The complaint consists of one count which alleges, in substance, the following: That the defendants Miree were the owners and defendant Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc., a corporation, “was the agent *294 with charge and control … Co. of Tennessee v. Porterfield, 239 Ala. 148, 150-151 , 194 So. 173 , *295 supra; Cairnes v. Hillman Drug Co., 214 Ala. 545, 548 , 108 So. 362 ; Spangler v. Hobson, 212 Ala. 105, 106 , 101 So. 828 .