Case law

Brown v. State

74 Ala. 478 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1883

Hom. § 480; Pierson v. The State, 12 Ala. 149 ; Eiland v. The State, 52 Ala. 322 . 7. … The pertinent portion of this declaration is, “Iwould hme gotten him” [Brown], “if he had not been too guide for me.” *485 The evidence shows that Brown and the deceased were engaged in a very close hand-to-hand contest,

Brown v. State

250 Ala. 444 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 15, 1948

MacMahon v. Dozier, 237 Ala. 574 , 187 So. 710 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Dennis, 212 Ala. 590 , 103 So. 894 ; Sharp v. Edwards, 203 Ala. 205 (6 and 7), 82 So. 455 ; Dorsey v. … Kinney v. White, 215 Ala. 247 , 110 So. 394 ; Gibson v. Edwards, 245 Ala. 334 , 16 So.2d 865 ; Ex parte Hood, 107 Ala. 520 , 18 So. 176 ; Anders v. Latimer, 198 Ala. 573 , 73 So. 925 ; Bell v.

Brown v. Denson

895 So. 2d 882 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 2004

Clair Board of Education. Curtis Brown sold Denson the disability policy. He signed Denson's enrollment form *884 next to the words "Signature of Agent." … Int'l v.

Brown v. State

47 Ala. 47 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1872

Its judgment is a declaration of the law. — Haney v. The State, 5 Wis. 529 ; Jones v. Commonwealth, 20 Grattan, 848. … And the defendant, said Jonas Brown, will not be discharged! except, by due course of law.

Brown v. Lang

4 Ala. 50 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1842

[Creager v. Bengle, 4 H. and John. Rep. 234; Watts v. Kinney, 3 Leigh. Rep. 272.] But the assumed equity of the bill is, that the plaintiff, as the indorser of Mrs. … Rep. 112; Worthington v. Ferguson,4 H. and John. Rep. 522; Tankersley v. Anderson, 4 Dess. Rep. 44; Miller v. Pendleton, 4 H. and Munf. Rep. 436.]

Brown v. State

108 Ala. 18 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1895

.— Hall v. State, 53 Ala. 463 ; Lawson v. State, 20 Ala. 65 ; Collins v. State, 14 Ala. 608 ; State v. Glaze, 9 Ala. 283 . … In Lawson v.

Stiles v. Brown

380 So. 2d 792 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 22, 1980

Stiles are Eva Stiles Brown and Susie Stiles Sharp, the daughters of Claude L. Stiles. … In Jaques v.

Brown v. State

83 Ala. 33 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1887

. — Jordan v. State, 81 Ala. 32 ; Tesney v. State, 77 Ala. 33 ; DeArman v. State, 71 Ala. 351 ; Storey v. State, 71 Ala. 329 . … The State holds the affirmative of these negative propositions of the plea of self-defense. — Hadley v. State, 55 Ala. 31 ; DeArman v. State, supra.

Zills v. Brown

382 So. 2d 528 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 1980

Brown and Bradley, both of whom are board certified urologists, [1] for failing to timely diagnose and properly treat Zills' cancer of the testicle (a type known as testicular seminoma) by timely and proper removal of the … Medical Association, and pass both oral and written national board examinations concerning urological diseases and treatment. [1] Moore v.

Collier v. Brown

285 Ala. 40 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1969

Mudd v. Lanier, 247 Ala. 363 , 24 So.2d 550 (1945). … Joseph v. Hopkins, 276 Ala. 18 , 158 So.2d 660 (1963).

Brown v. Master

104 Ala. 451 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

Margaret Master is plaintiff and Annie brown is defendant in this action. The complaint contains two counts. … Ency. of Law, p. 36, note 6 ; McKellar v. Couch, 34 Ala. 336 ; Benson & Co. v. McCoy, 36 Ala. 710 ; Tucker v. Adams, 52 Ala. 254, 256; Lunsford v. Dietrich, 93 Ala. 565 , and authorities there cited.

Beatty v. Brown

76 Ala. 267 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884

. — The principle settled in Cooper v. Watson, 73 Ala. 252 , is conclusive, in our opinion, against the plaintiff’s right of recovery in the present action. … Ed.), 660; Brothers v. Hurdle, 10 Tred. (L.) 190 ; Powell v. Smith, 2 Watts (Penn.) 126; Cooper v. Watson, 73 Ala. 252 , supra.

Brown v. Bartlett

2 Ala. 29 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1841

In the case of Goldthwaite v. Wilkerson [1 Stewt. & Por. 159] an amendment of this kind was made after the lapse of seven years. … What evidence will bo sufficient to authorize the amendment of a part of the record nunc pro tunc, is largely discussed in the case of Moody v. Keenar, 9th Porter, 252.

Brown v. Isbell

11 Ala. 1009 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1847

An indorsement must be made on the paper .itself, and,not by a writing separate and distinct from it, (Gookin v. … [Carlisle v. The Cahawba and Marion Railroad Co. 4 Ala. R. 70.]

Rembert v. Brown

17 Ala. 667 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1850

. — Hardy v. Summers, 10 Gill & J. 317; Morwen v. Smith, 1 Green’s Ch. R. 172. … . — Poor v. Charlton, 3 Sumner, 75; Hollister v. Barkly, 9 N. Hamp. 230; Sherrill v. Harrell, 1 Ired. Eq. R. 194.

Dillingham v. Brown

38 Ala. 311 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1862

.; Hearick v. Doe, 4 Ind. 164 ; Crommelin v. Minter, 24 Ala. 352 ; Pillow v. Roberts, 13 How. 472, 477 . … Inge, 5 Porter, 327 ; Fipps v. McGehee, ib. 413; Rosser v. Bradford, 9 Porter, 354 ; Stevens v. Fing, 21 Ala. 432 ; Long v. McDougald, 23 Ala. 413 ; Tarver v. Smith, at the last term.

Tarry v. Brown

34 Ala. 159 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1859

. & Ev. 861; Graham v. Peat, 1 East, 244; 2 Saunders’ R. 47 ; Squire v. Hollenbeck, 9 Pick. 561 . … Tarry, and the testimony of Garrott, all tended to show title to the property in the defendant Brown, as the executor of the last will and testament of Mrs. Tarry, and were, therefore, properly admitted in evidence.

Brown v. Barnes

6 Ala. 694 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1844

In McKenzie v. Jackson, [ 4 Ala. 230 ,] we had occasion to consider this question. … The same decision was made by the supreme court of Massachusetts, in the case of Nelson v. Boynton, [3 Metcalfe, 396,] after an elaborate examination of the authorities.

Fountain v. Brown

38 Ala. 72 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1861

Houston, 33 Ala. 563; Hughes v. Hughes, 31 Ala. 526 ; Allen v. … . — Stubbs v. Houston, 33 Ala. 559 , 564; Carmichael v.

Brown v. Beason

24 Ala. 466 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1854

Pl. 179, and cases there cited; Hyde v. Noble, 13 N. H. 494; Lee v. Mathews, 10 Ala. 682 .