Case law

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Brown

56 Ala. 411 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

. — Stewart v. Hood, 10 Ala. 600 ; Garnett v. Yoe, 17 Ala. 74 . … Cureton, 36 Ala. 120 ; McCrary v. Turk, 29 Ala. 244 ; Saltmarsh v. Bower, 34 Ala. 613 . The reason of the rule is, that the objection is founded on a defect which can be cured.

Goodall-Brown & Co. v. Ray

168 Ala. 350 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 3, 1910

See note to the case of Lester v. People, 41 Am. St.

Doe ex dem. Brown v. Clements

24 Ala. 354 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1854

That the failure of the clerks to do their duty, in not placing causes on the docket, shall work no prejudice to the parties, was settled by this court in Wiswall v. Glidden, 4 Ala.

Brown v. City of Huntsville

891 So. 2d 295 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 16, 2004

Our resolution of this case is consistent with our resolution of Water & Wastewater Board of Madison v. … Like Brown, the Utility does not dispute the facts found by the trial court. Because Brown contends that the trial court erred only in applying the law, we employ a de novo standard of review. Beavers v.

Voss & Co. v. Robertson, Brown & Co.

46 Ala. 483 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1871

. — Story on Agency, §§ 224, 78, 437 ; Bott v. McCoy & Johnson, 20 Ala. 578 . … In Gardner & Sayre v.

Brown v. Gay-Padgett Hdw. Co.

188 Ala. 423 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 25, 1914

In the case of Gunter v. … In State v.

James M. Brown & Co. v. Scarboro

97 Ala. 316 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 1, 1892

When he boarded the train at Bamer there W6re a good many persons standing about the side-track but plaintiff did not know them. … As we have already indicated, the reasonable belief of plaintiff that the train, when he boarded it, was about to depart for Troy, must under the circumstances of this case have been justified by some conduct on the part

Brown v. Standard Casket Mfg. Co.

234 Ala. 512 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1937

Crider v. Yolande Coal & Coke Co., 206 Ala. 71 , 89 So. 285 ; McCauley v. Tennessee C. I. Co., 93 Ala. 356 , 9 So. 611 ; Lawrence v. Kaul Lumber Co., 171 Ala. 300 , 55 So. 111 ; First-National Bank of Dothan et al. v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Allied Supply Co., Inc. v. Brown

585 So. 2d 33 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 9, 1991

Brown, Christopher, and Graben moved for a summary judgment on each count in Allied's complaint. … Bell v. South Central Bell , 564 So.2d 46 (Ala. 1990); Bailey v. Intergraph Corp. , 537 So.2d 21 (Ala. 1988).

Noble v. Personnel Board

267 Ala. 488 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 20, 1958

Mullein v. McDonough Construction Co. of Georgia, 266 Ala. 281 , 95 So.2d 921 ; King v. Jackson, 264 Ala. 339 , 87 So.2d 623 . … For an analogous case, see Ennis v. State, 37 Ala.

Mayrant & Co. v. Marston, Brown & Co.

67 Ala. 453 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

Browning, 61 Ala. 80 ; 1 Brick. Dig. 865, §§ 866-7-8. The agreement, out of which the present controversy grew, does not constitute the two firms partners inter sese. … To constitute a partnership between themselves, parties must stipulate for a community of risks, *458 as well as a partition of gains. — Smith v. Garth, 32 Ala. 368 ; Meaher v. Cox, 37 Ala. 201 .

Brown v. Cerco Enterprises, Inc.

286 Ala. 421 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 5, 1970

Cox v. Martin, 250 Ala. 401 , 34 So.2d 463 ; Shepherd v. … Co. v. Berger Inv. Co., 264 Ala. 208 , 86 So.2d 282 .” Lee v. Moore, 282 Ala. 461, 463 , 213 So.2d 197, 198 . In Yellow Cab Company of Birmingham v.

Smith v. Brown-Service Ins. Co.

250 Ala. 613 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 20, 1948

Skipper owned the car before he began to work for Brown-Service. … Hill v. Decatur Ice & Coal Co., 219 Ala. 380 , 122 So. 338 ; Bourns v. Hagen et al., 192 Wash. 588 , 74 P.2d 205 ; Brown v. Bond, 190 Miss. 774 , 1 So.2d 794 ; Nagy v.

Pinto Credit Union v. Brown

535 So. 2d 139 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 4, 1988

As we stated in Swan v. … Donaldson v. Williams, 284 Ala. 140 , 222 So.2d 725 (1969).” Because the ten-year limitations period is applicable, Pinto’s counterclaim and answer were unaffected by the statute of limitations.

Ala. Midland R'way Co. v. Brown

98 Ala. 647 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

As was said in Parker v. … Tbe purpose intended and tbe effect of tbe remedy by reformation of an instrument is very fully considered in tbe case of Gardner & Gates v. Moore, 75 Ala. 394 .

Brown v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad

87 Ala. 370 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1888

—Code of 1886, § 839; Taylor v. Woods, 52 Ala. 474 ; Burns v. Henry, 67 Ala. 209 ; Carter v. Alford, 64 Ala. 236 ; Rodgers v. Gaines, 73 Ala. *372 218 ; Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. Christian, 82 Ala. 307 . … Co. v. Morris, 65 Ala. 193 ; Zeigler v. S. & N. R. R. Co., 58 Ala. 594 ; Smith v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 75 Ala. 449 ; Mayor v. Stonewall Ins. Co., 53 Ala. 570 ; Green v. State, 73 Ala. 26 .

Carson v. City of Prichard

709 So. 2d 1199 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 30, 1998

Water Works Sewer Board of the Town of Ardmore v. Wales , 533 So.2d 212 (Ala. 1988), citing Sisco v. City of Huntsville , 220 Ala. 59 , 60 , 124 So. 95 (1929). … Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc. , 564 So.2d 412 , 413 (Ala. 1990); Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co. , 495 So.2d 1381 , 1383 (Ala. 1986); Wilson v. Brown , 496 So.2d 756 , 758 (Ala. 1986).

Brown v. Rome & Decatur Railroad

86 Ala. 206 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1888

. & Def. 284, 286; Sharp v. *208 Johnson, 40 Amer. Dec. 259, and note; Redf. Railways, § 64; Pierce, Railroads, 170, 494; Mills Em. Dom. § 92; Chandler v. Hanna, 73 Ala. 390 . … Railway Co. v. Howard, 20 Ib. 18; Davis v. P. & B. R. R. Co., 60 Me. 303 . Only challenges for cause should be allowed, in cases like the present. Reversed and remanded.

King v. WA Brown & Sons, Inc.

585 So. 2d 10 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 28, 1991

Brown Sons, Inc. ("Brown Sons"). … Although Brown Sons cross-examined Vance, Brown Sons offered no expert testimony regarding the "slip resistance" of the cooler floor.

Brown v. Michelin North America, Inc.

161 So. 3d 164 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 24, 2014

In Morton v. … V.