Case law

Brown v. W.R.M.A. Broadcasting Company

286 Ala. 186 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 6, 1970

Crommelin v. … State v. Clark, 60 Kan. 450 , 56 P. 767 .” “Moral turpitude signifies an inherent quality of baseness, vileness, depravity.” Gillman v. State, supra. However, as the court pointed out in Marion v.

Brown v. J. & T. Simpson

3 Stew. 331 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1831

It is contended that the capias ad satisfaciendum, issued against Middleton, the defendant in the original suit, is a void process, and that consequently Brown, the plaintiff in error, who was his bail, is not liable.

City of Birmingham v. Brown

969 So. 2d 910 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 23, 2007

See City of Prattville v. … See Sargent v. Lambert Constr. Co. , 378 So.2d 1153 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979).

UBS PaineWebber, Inc. v. Brown

880 So. 2d 411 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 10, 2003

governs Brown's transactions. … SouthTrust Bank v.

Dominey v. Johnson-Brown Co.

219 Ala. 666 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 1929

Lysle Milling Co. v. N. A. Gro. Co., 201 Ala. 222 , 77 So. 748 ; Hieronymus v. Bienville, Water S. Co., 131 Ala. 447 , 31 So. 31 ; Drake v. Goree, 22 Ala. 409 ; Ackley & Co. v. … McKinney v. Baker, 212 Ala. 490 , 103 So. 467 ; Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co., 179 Ala. 535 , 60 So. 838 ; Bell v. Reynolds, 78 Ala. 511 , 56 Am. Rep. 52 ; Covington Mfg. Co. v.

Brown v. General Motors Corp.

14 So. 3d 104 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 16, 2009

Brown now appeals. Issues Brown argues three issues on appeal. First, Brown argues that the trial court relied on this Court’s decision in Tittle v. … Co. v.

Williamson v. Wynnwood Personal Care Home I

907 So. 2d 407 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 29, 2004

Delavan v. Board of Dental Examiners, 620 So.2d [13] at 18 [(Ala.Civ.App.1992)] (quoting Board of Dental Examiners v. … NABERS, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. .

Williams & Brown v. Hurley & Blackburn

135 Ala. 319 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1902

Blackmon, Plaintiffs, v. Williams and Brown, a firm composed of Dote M. Williams and Morgan L. Brown, Defendants. … Blackburn, v. Williams and Brown, a firm composed of Dote M. Williams and Morgan L. Brown.

Weaver v. Firestone

155 So. 3d 952 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 13, 2013

See Spitsyn v. … Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 7 Cal.4th 926 , 873 P.2d 613 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 (1994), is particularly instructive for purposes of the present case.

Brown v. Alabama Chemical Co.

207 Ala. 215 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 9, 1922

Such was the case in Nashua River Paper Co. v. … The conclusion, then, drawn by this court in Thompson v.

Brown v. Economy Baler Co.

599 So. 2d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 20, 1992

Matrix-Churchill v. Springsteen , 461 So.2d 782 (Ala. 1984). In Andrews v. John E. … In Turner v. Wean United, Inc. , 531 So.2d 827 , 830-31 (Ala. 1988) (quoting Turner v.

Grooms v. Brown-Marx Co.

236 Ala. 655 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 25, 1938

Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company v. Lake Street Elevated Railroad Co., 177 U.S. 51, 61 , 20 S.Ct. 564 , 44 L.Ed. 667 ; Peck v. Jenness, 7 How. 612 , 12 L.Ed. 841 ; Freeman v. Howe, 24 How. 450 , 16 L.Ed. 749 ; Moran v. … ANDERSON, C.J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Brown & Hagin Co. v. McCullough

194 Ala. 638 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 14, 1915

McClerkin, 77 Ala. 580; Stephenson v. Wright, 111 Ala. 586 , 20 South. 622 .” The same is certainly true as to the writ of seizure in this case. … No court can subject property, outside of its jurisdiction, to its process. — Douglass v. Insurance Co., 138 *642 N. Y. 209 , 33 N. S. 938, 20 L. R. A. 118, 34 Am. St. Rep. 448 . See, also, Kress v.

Dunn v. ALABAMA ST. UNIV. BD. OF TRUSTEES

628 So. 2d 519 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 8, 1993

Jacobs Banking Co. v. Campbell , 406 So.2d 834 (Ala. 1981); City of Birmingham v. Long , 339 So.2d 1021 (Ala. 1976); Byrd v. Sorrells , 265 Ala. 589 , 93 So.2d 146 (1957)." Smith v. … "We said in Jones v.

Brown v. Abus Kransysteme GmbH

11 So. 3d 788 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 12, 2008

Brown’s brief, at 51. In particular, her brief includes the following quote from Hanamint Corp. v. … Brown also cites Clune v. Alimak AB, 233 F.3d 538 (8th Cir.2000), which, she says, is “[d]irectly on point.” Brown’s brief, at 48.

Cornelius v. Green

477 So. 2d 1363 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 11, 1985

City of Birmingham v. City of Fairfield , 396 So.2d 692 (Ala. 1981). Since this motion was not filed within 30 days of the May 25, 1982, judgment, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to amend that judgment. … In Nowlin v. Druid City Hospital Board , 475 So.2d 469 (Ala. 1985), this Court set forth a very strict standard for granting relief under a Rule 60 (b)(6) motion.

Armory Commission of Alabama v. Staudt

388 So. 2d 991 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 1980

Co. v. Board of Adjustment , 234 Ala. 372 , 175 So. 383 (1937). Necessarily our inquiry is whether a suit against the Armory Commission is a suit against the state within § 14 of the Alabama Constitution. … State Docks Commission v. Barnes , 225 Ala. 403 , 406-07 , 143 So. 581 , 584 (1932). In State Docks Commission v.

City of Montgomery v. Brown

285 Ala. 64 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 4, 1969

Brown, Joyce Brown and Owen Brown as complainants.” On August 31, 1962, the respondent, the City of Montgomery, amended its demurrer by adding two grounds. … White v. Cotner, 170 Ala. 324 , 54 So. 114 ; Cooper v. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co., 214 Ala. 400 , 108 So. 20 ; Adams v. Woods, 263 Ala. 381 , 82 So.2d 531 .

Brown v. Adair

1 Stew. & P. 49 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 15, 1831

Alabama Power Co. v. Brown

205 Ala. 167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 2, 1920

Co. v. Rosen, 159 Ala. 195, 206 , 48 South. 798 , 133 Am. St. Rep. 32 ; Sheffield Co. v. Harris, 183 Ala. 357 , 61 South. 88 ; B. R., L. & P. Co. v. Drennen, 175 Ala. 338 , 57 South. 876 , Ann. … Co. v. Faust, 17 Ala. App. 96 , 82 South. 36 ; E. T., V. & G. R. Co. v. Deaver, 79 Ala. 220 .