Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersala

10,000+ results

1.72s

  • Robbins v. Brown

    151 Ala. 236 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 28, 1907

    Conceding that a note given jointly by the husband and wife imports a joint obligation of the husband and wife (Pulliam v. … Brown was, according to previous decisions of this court, without any right to redeem, and her deed to the respondents did not impart to them nor clothe them with any such right, and cannot avail them anything. — Walden v

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fore v. Brown

    544 So. 2d 955 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 28, 1989

    Brown to perform the procedure. Dr. Brown discussed the procedure with Mr. … Brown was negligent in failing to obtain his informed consent before performing the dilation procedure on him. We hold that it was not. In Fain v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Grimes

    60 Ala. 647 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

    The legacy to Elizabeth Brown, subsequently Gunn, is purely pecuniary in its character; and the fact that it was made a charge on land does not change its character as a pecuniary legacy. … This principle, or this case, is not at all affected by the rulings in Brashear v. Williams, 10 Ala. 650 ; Marshall v. Crow, 29 Ala. 178 ; Anderson v. Anderson, 37 Ala. 683 ; Perryman v. Greer, 39 Ala. 133 ; Bethea v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Watters v. Brown

    177 Ala. 78 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 4, 1912

    Co. v. Brakefield, 123 Ala. 605 , 26 South. 646 . The objection to the evidence as covered by the first two assignments of error cannot reverse the case. … There was evidence tending to show possession of McCurdy and that it was adverse, and it was therefore competent for defendant to show' that while he was in possession it was generally known as McCurdy’s land.— Owen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Loveman v. Brown

    138 Ala. 608 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1903

    .” — Wood on Master and Servant, Sec. 119 and note, Secs. 121, 140, 155; Strauss v. Meertief, 64 Ala. 299 ; Bass Furnace Co. v. Glasscock, 82 Ala. 452 ; Jones v. Field, 83 Ala., 445 ; Troy Fertilizer Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rottenberry v. Brown

    142 Ala. 630 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

    . — Cofer v. Shening, 98 Ala. 338 ; Bruce v. Bradshaw, 69 Ala. 360 ; Scranton v. Ballard, 64 Ala. 403 . The judgment of the court is affirmed. McClellan, C. J., Tyson and Anderson, J. J., concurring.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jenks v. Brown

    250 Ala. 534 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 13, 1948

    Complainant and defendant Dennis Brown were married in October 1937, and a decree of divorce was entered in said Blount County Circuit Court August 1, 1944. … Roebuck v. Hooie, Ala.Sup., 34 So.2d 460 ; 1 Greene v. Greene, 249 Ala. 155 , 30 So.2d 444 ; Moss v. Ingram, 246 Ala. 214 , 20 So.2d 202 , a question often difficult to determine.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kemp v. Brown

    251 Ala. 552 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 20, 1949

    The bill filed by Brown, appellee, against Kemp, appellant, sought foreclosure of a mortgage, appointment of a receiver, and deficiency decree. The demurrer was to the bill as a whole. … Flagg v. Florence Discount Co., 228 Ala. 153 , 153 So. 177 ; *553 Graham v. O’Neal, 242 Ala. 72 , 4 So.2d 897 . In Hamill v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    694 So. 2d 1342 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 16, 1997

    In December 1992, Brown filed in the Madison Circuit Court an inverse condemnation action, concerning the State’s alleged taking of Brown’s property for the building of a road. … Co. v. Hardy, 541 So.2d 1057, 1060 (Ala.1989). The Montgomery Circuit Court acted correctly in the circumstances of this case. For these reasons, the State does not have a “clear legal right” to the relief it seeks.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Brown

    219 Ala. 414 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 1929

    Parra v. Cooper, 213 Ala. 340 , 104 So. 827 ; Cudd v. Wood, 205 Ala. 682 , 89 So. 52 ; 9 C. J. 1166; 18 C. J. 224-5. The evidence has been carefully considered and well supports the decree rendered. … by Ben Brown, and my recollection is that each of these parties, that is, Ben Brown and Emma Brown, received part of the cash consideration.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stallworth v. Brown

    155 Ala. 217 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1908

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Master

    111 Ala. 397 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1895

    Brown. The plaintiff was permitted to give evidence, through witness, Clarence Blalack, that before the attachment was sued out, he, the witness, went with his father, K. P. Blalack, to see Mr. … Brown came to see him he told her what information he *400 liad, and how lie got his knowledge of the goods being sold, or bargained for, and that they were to be sold in a lump, and the other things he had learned in reference

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jones

    24 Ala. 463 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1854

    Brown.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Folsom

    268 Ala. 278 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 9, 1958

    Pinney v. Williams, 69 Ala. 311, 317 ). Said motion was granted and judgment rendered dismissing the petition at the cost of petitioner. This, appeal is from that judgment. Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 1074. … Throughout the amendatory act (Act No. 773, supra) reference is made to the “employing board of education.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wakefield

    437 So. 2d 112 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 19, 1983

    The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded on the authority of Land v. Bowyer, - So.2d -(Ala.1983) [MS. Aug. 12, 1983], REVERSED AND REMANDED.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kramer v. Brown

    114 Ala. 612 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1896

    . — Peagler v. Stabler, 91 Ala. 308 ; Daniels v. Lowery, 92 Ala. 519 ; Reeves v. Abercrombie, 108 Ala. 538 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellison

    239 Ala. 320 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1940

    Daggett v. Boomer, 210 Ala. 673 , 99 So. 181 ; Davis v. Harris et al., 211 Ala. 679 , 101 So. 458 ; Consumers’ Roofing Co. v. Littlejohn, 228 Ala. 59 , 152 So. 31 ; Ex parte Bradshaw, 174 Ala. 243 , 57 So. 16 . … Craig et al. v. Swader et al., 225 Ala. 366 , 143 So. 553 ; Pollak v. Milam, 190 Ala. 569 , 67 So. 381 ; Henderson et al. v. Simmons, 234 Ala. 329 , 174 So. 491 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    244 Ala. 597 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 16, 1943

    Petition of the State, by its Attorney General for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Ped Brown and Ruby Bryant v. … THOMAS, BROWN, FOSTER, LIVINGSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berness v. Regency Square Associates

    514 So. 2d 1346 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 2, 1987

    In Folmar v. … Brown , 384 So.2d 1047 , 1048 (Ala. 1980), quoting Lewis v. Zell , 279 Ala. 33 , 36 , 181 So.2d 101 (1965).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Trulove v. Brown

    21 Ala. 544 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1852

    We beld, in tbe case of Lowremore v. … Sewall v. Henry, 9 Ala. 24 ; Bogan v. Martin, 8 Ala. 807 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.