Case law

Brown v. Beatty

76 Ala. 250 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884

Code, 1876, § 3704; Houston v. Fariss & McCurdy, 71 Ala. 570 ; Beck v. Glenn, 69 Ala. 121 ; Womack v. Powers, 50 Ala. 5 ; Russell v. Desplons, 29 Ala. 308 ; Trial of Title to Land (Sedgw. & Wait), § 94.

Brown v. Patterson

214 Ala. 351 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 25, 1926

Powell v. West, 94 So. 475 , 208 Ala. 388 ; Bardan v. Maddox, 39 So. 95 , 141 Ala. 508 ; Mitchell v. Gambill, 37 So. 290 , 140 Ala. 316 ; Bynum v. Jones, 59 So. 65 , 177 Ala. 431 ; Morris v. … Code, § 10179; Martin v. Brown, 75 Ala. 442 . Under our decisions, recoupment is allowed upon claims arising in tort, as well as upon contract. Nabring v. Bank of Mobile, 58 Ala. 204 ; Grisham v.

Brown v. Floyd

163 Ala. 317 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1909

Brown et al. after the death of the intestate of the said Brown. As for such trespass, the personal representative is liable individually, but not in his representative capacity. … Brown as administrator should have been sustained to the complaint. It stated no cause of action against him in that capacity. The complaint should have been amended in this respect. — Shorter v.

Bateh v. Brown

293 Ala. 704 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 20, 1975

(For a more detailed history of this case, including other provisions of the trial Court’s decrees in two separate actions and their reversals, see Bateh v. Brown, 289 Ala. 695 , 271 So.2d 830 (1972); and Bateh v. … Gleichert v.

Brown v. Johnson

17 Ala. 232 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1850

.— Margetts v. Barringer, 7 Simons, 482. In Newman v.

Brown v. Foster

4 Ala. 282 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1842

[Beek v. Robley, 1 H. B. 89; Marsh v. Newall, 1 Taunt. 109; Randall v. Bell, Bailey J. 1 M. & S. 723; Hall v. Gentry, 1 Marshall, 555.] *285 2. … [Chisholm v. Newton, 1 Ala. Rep. 371 .]

Thompson v. Brown

200 Ala. 382 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1917

Camp v. Simon, 34 Ala. 126 . … Worthington v.

Brown v. Burnum

99 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1892

of hands, and board of Bobert Caskey himself. … Hart v. Clark, 54 Ala. 490 ; Levy v. Williams, 79 Ala. 171 ; Reese v. Bradford, 13 Ala. 837 . In McGown v.

Hilliard v. Brown

103 Ala. 318 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

In the case of Pryor v. … . — King v. Poole, 36 Barb. Sup. Ct. Rep. 242; Jordan v. Dennis, 7 Metcalf 590; Hawes on Jurisdiction of Courts, § 19 and note ; 1 Freeman on Judgments, § 120. By our statuteshosts are awarded to the successful party.

Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.

893 So. 2d 1090 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 4, 2004

Wilson v. Brown , 496 So.2d 756 , 758 (Ala. 1986); Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co. , 495 So.2d 1381 (Ala. 1986). See also Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc. , 564 So.2d 412 (Ala. 1990). "`. . . Ala. … SEE, BROWN, and STUART, JJ., and MADDOX, Special Justice, * concur.

Ex Parte Madison County Bd. of Education

1 So. 3d 980 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 27, 2008

In Ray v. … Florida Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 133 F.3d 797 , 802 (11th Cir.1998) (quoting Brown v. Crawford, 906 F.2d 667, 671 (11th Cir.1990) (citations omitted and emphasis added)). Accord George v.

Estes v. State

358 So. 2d 1057 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1978

Nor, do we agree that in Patton v. City of Decatur , 337 So.2d 321 (Ala. 1976) there was no other evidence of intoxication. WRIT DENIED. TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

Davis v. Brown

513 So. 2d 1001 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 21, 1987

That the school board owned the property adjoining the lot that Davis purchased. 4. That Brown told Davis that she could change the plans of the house. 5. … There is also evidence, including Brown's testimony, that at no time during the negotiations did the school board own the property and that Brown was aware of this fact.

Brown v. Terry

375 So. 2d 457 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 28, 1979

United Security Life Insurance Co. v. Birmingham Trust Nat. Bank , 282 Ala. 295 , 211 So.2d 139 (1968); Maner v. Maner, Jr. , 279 Ala. 652 , 189 So.2d 336 (1966); Bromberg v. First Nat. … Rowe v. Johnson , 214 Ala. 510 , 108 So. 604 (1926); Clark v. Whitfield , 213 Ala. 441 , 105 So. 200 (1925). Privity would be lacking here.

Steele v. Brown

70 Ala. 235 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881

—Pollard v. Cocke, 19 Ala. 188 . … —Beavers v. Smith, 11 Ala. 20 ; Slatter v. Meek, 35 Ala. 528 .

Brown v. State

55 Ala. 123 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

Tbe eases of Donohoo v. The State, 36 Ala. 281 , and Walker v. The State, 52 Ala. 376 , are relied on in support of tbe charge in this case. … See Com. v. Strupney, 105 Mass. 588 ; Roscoe’s Cr.Ev. 347. Under tbe rules above declared, tbe Circuit Court erred in tbe explanatory charge given. Reversed and remanded.

Brown v. Fogarty

221 Ala. 283 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1930

It is not very clear; neither is count 1 in Hart v. … Adler v. Miller, supra. And, as there said: “It should set forth the conditions on which the right of the action ex contractu for personal injury rests, as stated in Hart v. Coleman, supra.”

Brown v. State

206 Ala. 546 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 27, 1921

Pryor v. Brown

209 Ala. 701 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 19, 1923

Brown v. Hay

1 Stew. & P. 102 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 15, 1831

-James- Brown died intestate, leaving no wife or child; but left two sisters,. the wives of the present defendants, and his father Allen Brown, the plaintiff. … Thus the ascent of the sisters to Allen Brown, the plaintiff, and corn mon aiice~tor, is one degree: the descent. from him to a level with the deceased bro-tl~er, would be another degree, whereas the ascent from the deceaced