Case law

Brown v. State

150 Ala. 25 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 2, 1907

—Gregory v. State, 140 Ala. 16 , 37 South. 259 ; McQueen v. State, 94 Ala. 50 , 10 South. 433 . … —Shirley v. State, 144 Ala. 35 , 40 South. 269 . Charges 42 and 43, requested by the defendant, were properly refused. They were mere answers to the solicitor’s argu ment.—T ribble v.

Stoudenmire v. Brown

57 Ala. 481 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

In Davis v. … —See Rivers v. Thompson, 43 Ala. 633; Black, on Tax Titles, 84 et seq.; ib. 430 et seq. ; Cooley on Taxation, 307, 324-5, 356.

Haden v. Brown

18 Ala. 641 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1851

.' — McKay et al. v. Dodge et al., 5 Ala. 388 ; Bang et al v. Strong, 7 Hill, 250 . Nor is it material whether such alteration is prejudicial to the security or not. … because the creditor will not, at his request, proceed to convert such collateral security into money, although the property should be depreciated in value in consequence of his neglect to sell. — Branch Bank at Montgomery v.

Brown v. State

288 Ala. 680 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 10, 1971

In Malloy v. … Pierre v.

Propst v. Brown

250 Ala. 282 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1948

Thurlow v. Berry, 247 Ala. 631, 638 (12), 25 So.2d 726 ; Wood v. Amos, 236 Ala. 477 , 183 So. 639 ; Becker Roofing Co. v. Meharg, 223 Ala. 163 , 134 So. 864 ; Emens v. … J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Collas v. Brown

211 Ala. 443 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 12, 1924

In Howard v. … See authorities, supra; Whitehead v. Dane, 72 Ala. 39 ; Jones v. Trawick’s Adm’r, 31 Ala. 253 ; Main v. Radney (Ala.) 39 South. 981 ; -Hall’s Appeal, 60 Pa. 458 , 100 Am. Dec. 584 ; 22 C. J. 1097-1120.

Bivens v. Brown

37 Ala. 422 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1861

The issue in this case was, wliafc were the terms of the contract between Bivens and Brown ? … .” — Blakey v. Blakey, 33 Ala. 621.; Ortez v. Jewett, 23 Ala. 662 . [2.]

Brown v. Wheeler

437 So. 2d 521 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 26, 1983

These appeals are by Dane Brown and Mary Gail Brown from an order of the trial court setting aside the appointment of an administrator ad litem and dismissing the claims against William V. Phifer, a deceased defendant. … Rende v. Kay , 415 F.2d at 984 .

Whitehead v. Brown

18 Ala. 682 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1851

The bill has two objects — to reform the deed, and to be relieved against the defendant Brown. … I have done no more than to state the case, because the case of Stone, Trustee, v. Hale, et al., 17 Ala. 557 , shows clearly that the complainant has a right to have the deed reformed and to be relieved agaiust Brown.

Brown v. Turner

15 Ala. 832 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1849

Wilson v. Brown

241 Ala. 178 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 30, 1941

Farmer v. Board of School Com’rs of Mobile County et al., 226 Ala. 62 , 145 So. 575 . (Italics supplied.) … City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com’rs Mobile County, 180 Ala. 489 , 61 So. 368 ; State ex rel. Denson v. Miller, President of Jury Commission of Shelby County, 204 Ala. 232 , 85 So. 698 .

Larry v. Brown

153 Ala. 452 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 14, 1907

—Johnson v. Thomas, 77 Ala. 367; Heard v. Pulaski, 80 Ala. 502 , 2 South. 343 ; McCurdy v. Middleton, 82 Ala. 131, 137 , 2 South. 721 ; Kent & Barnett v. Marks & Gayle, 101 Ala. 350, 353 , 14 South. 472 . … . — Strickland v. Har die, 82 Ala. 412, 414 , 3 South. 40 ; Boyd & Co. v. Jones & Poye, 96 Ala. 305, 308 , 11 South. 405 , 38 Am. St. Rep. 100 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250, 252 , 15 Soutt. 568; Darden v.

Brown v. State

105 Ala. 117 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

—Ex parte Pruitt & Harper, 99 Ala. 227 ; Ex parte Crawlin, 92 Ala. 101 ; Foster v. The State, 88 Ala. 182; Nicholson v. The State, 72 Ala. 178 .

Roddam v. Brown

201 Ala. 109 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 20, 1917

Bixby-Theisen Co. v. … Herring v. Skaggs, supra; Jones v. Ross, 98 Ala. 448 , 13 South. 319 ; Bessemer Ice Delivery Co. v. Brannen, 138 Ala. 157 , 35 South. 56 , and cases there cited.

Beatty v. Brown

85 Ala. 209 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1887

. — Smith v. Coleman, 59 Ala. 260 .

Brown v. Leitch

60 Ala. 313 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

—Ross v. Hannah, 18 Ala. 125 ; Gresham v. Walker, 10 Ala. 370 ; Bell v. Davis, 42 Ala. 460 . The right to claim personal property as exempt is a mere personal privilege .—Mickles v. Tousley, 1 Cow. 114 ; Earl v. … In Bibb v.

Brown v. Beatty

76 Ala. 250 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884

Code, 1876, § 3704; Houston v. Fariss & McCurdy, 71 Ala. 570 ; Beck v. Glenn, 69 Ala. 121 ; Womack v. Powers, 50 Ala. 5 ; Russell v. Desplons, 29 Ala. 308 ; Trial of Title to Land (Sedgw. & Wait), § 94.

Brown v. Floyd

163 Ala. 317 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1909

Brown et al. after the death of the intestate of the said Brown. As for such trespass, the personal representative is liable individually, but not in his representative capacity. … Brown as administrator should have been sustained to the complaint. It stated no cause of action against him in that capacity. The complaint should have been amended in this respect. — Shorter v.

Hollings v. Brown

202 Ala. 504 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 16, 1919

Brown, of the respondents. … E. 348, 352 ; Most v. Mass. Bond. & Ins. Co., supra. [2] There was no garnishment of the respondent Georgia Casualty Company, in aid of the pending suit by Hollings against Brown, or for the collection of the judgment.

Brown v. State

209 Ala. 490 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 26, 1923

Edgar v. State, 183 Ala. 36 , 62 So. 800 ; Zininam v. State, 186 Ala. 9 -12, 65 So. 56 . … Scott v. State, 141 Ala. 39 , 37 So. 366 ; Hall v. State, 18 Ala. App. 407 , 92 So. 527 .