Case law

Ex parte Hable

278 Ala. 11 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 22, 1965

Our judgment was vacated and the cause was remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 . In Lane v. Brown, supra, Brown had been convicted in Indiana. … In Burns v.

Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.

370 So. 2d 1384 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 25, 1979

See Lollar v. Alabama Power Company , supra; Odom v. Linsey , 365 So.2d 664 , (Ala. 1978); Hogan v. Alabama Power Company , 351 So.2d 1378 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977), cert. denied , 351 So.2d 1388 (Ala. 1977). … Winn-Dixie v. Godwin , 349 So.2d 37 (Ala. 1977); May-Bilt, Inc. v. Deese , 281 Ala. 579 , 206 So.2d 590 (1967).

Alabama Department of Environmental Management v. Water Works & Sewer Board

623 So. 2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 1993

The Board has filed a brief in *1063 support of ADEM’s petition. … For example, in Pucket v.

Henri-Duval Winery, LLC v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

26 So. 3d 1149 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 1, 2009

Dark's Dairy v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

281 Ala. 293 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 17, 1967

White Way Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 265 Ala. 660 , 93 So.2d 509 . … Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Roberts, 274 Ala. 256 , 147 So.2d 822 (1962) involved a bill seeking preliminary or interlocutory relief.

Browning v. City of Gadsden

359 So. 2d 361 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1978

In McGruder v. … The McGruder rationale has been followed by this court in Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County v. Reynolds , 294 Ala. 21 , 310 So.2d 876 (1975), and Blackmon v.

Alabama State Board of Health ex rel. Baxley v. Chambers County

335 So. 2d 653 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 16, 1976

State By and Through State Board for Registration of Architects v. … The case which we believe bears closest analogy to the instant case is George v. Board of Revenue and Road Com’rs of Mobile County, 207 Ala. 227 , 92 So. 269 (1922).

Taxpayers & Citizens v. Board of Water & Sewer Commissioners

275 Ala. 349 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1963

See City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, 258 Ala. 669 , 64 So.2d 824 ; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. … City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra.

Ex Parte Montgomery

244 Ala. 91 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 25, 1943

Coplon v. State, 15 Ala.App. 331 (8 and 9), 73 So. 225 ; Pellum v. State, 89 Ala. 28 , 8 So. 83 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 123 Fla. 785 , 167 So. 687 ; 24 Am.Jur. 866, § 49. … Brown v. Dewell, supra; note 127 A.L.R. 281 et seq.; United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 , (37), 60 S.Ct. 811, 849 , 84 L.Ed. 1129 ; Metzler v. United States, 9 Cir., 64 F.2d 203 .

Board of Revenue v. State ex rel. Wiley

199 Ala. 260 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1917

We think that the qualification fixed by the act is sanctioned by this court in the case of Finklea v. Farish, 160 Ala. 230 , 49 South. 366 , and which said case was reaffirmed in the case of State, ex rel. Brassell v. … Teasley, 194 Ala. 574 , 69 South. 723 , wherein it was pointed out that the case of Kentz v.

Waterworks & Sewer Board of the City of Selma v. Allen

3 So. 3d 846 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 15, 2008

“In Kid’s Care, Inc. v. … Board of Trs. of Alabama State Univ., 703 So.2d 335 (Ala.1997); Gilbert v. Wells, 473 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1985).

State Board of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Ala.

284 Ala. 562 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 18, 1969

From that decree the State Board of Optometry, the complainant below, appealed to this court. … Skains v. Barnes, supra; Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Green, supra; Fuqua v. Fuqua, supra; Cutter v. Waddingham, 33 Mo. 269 ; Berry v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.

Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Conecuh County Board of Education

495 So. 2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1986

The tenure statutes do not provide for any alternative procedure where the board is found to be too biased to conduct a hearing. … In light of the board members’ strong statements that a hearing would not affect their decision to terminate Gantt’s employment, the board’s argument, that the Court of Civil Appeals’ findings do not support a conclusion

Wright v. Aldridge

219 Ala. 632 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 23, 1929

BROWN, J. … Lamar v. Commissioners’ Court of Marshall County, 21 Ala. 772 ; Wiley v. State, 117 Ala. 158 , 23 So. 690 .

Cooper v. State Ex Rel. Hawkins

226 Ala. 288 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1933

Woodward v. Skeggs, 154 Ala. 249 , 46 So. 268 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Porter, 145 Ala. 541 , 40 So. 144 ; State ex rel. Covington v. Thompson, 142 Ala. 98 , 38 So. 679 ; Smith v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Roman v. Woolfolk

98 Ala. 219 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

“We quoted approvingly tbe cases of Greaves v. Gonge, 69 N. Y. 154 , and Brewer v. Boston Theatre, 104 Mass. 378 . In Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U. … See, also, Mack v. DeBardeleben Coal & Iron Co.. 90 Ala. 396 .

Alabama Jersey Cattle Club v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

274 Ala. 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 28, 1963

White Way Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 265 Ala. 660 , 93 So.2d 509 . … Limiting our review to the scope contemplated by the Homewood decision, as we must do (White Way Pure Milk Co. v.

Jefferson County Board of Health v. Birmingham Hide & Tallow Co.

38 So. 3d 714 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 11, 2009

Smith v. Clark, 468 So.2d 138, 141 (Ala.1985).” Williams v. Williams, 910 So.2d 1284, 1286 (Ala.Civ.App.2005). … See also Ashley v. State ex rel. Brooks, 668 So.2d 7, 8 (Ala.

Pate v. State

243 Ala. 44 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 5, 1942

We are unable to find any distinction whatever, in principle, between the statement of facts in the instant case and that in the case of Brown Plumbing & Heating Co. v. McDowell, 240 Ala. 485 , 200 So. 104 . … Clearly, the agreed facts bring appellant within schedule 42, section 348 of the Revenue Act of 1935, and on the authority of Brown Plumbing & Heating Co. v.

State Board of Health v. Atnip Design & Supply Center, Inc.

385 So. 2d 1307 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 11, 1980

The Board counterclaimed for injunction against Plaintiffs to prevent the further development of the subdivision until all areas to be developed were approved by the Board. … McDowell-Purcell, Inc. v. Bass, 370 So.2d 942 (Ala.1979).