Case law

Water Works Board of City of Leeds v. Huffstutler

292 Ala. 669 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 22, 1974

To the same effect is the Court’s decision in Water Works Board of the City of Mobile v. City of Mobile, 253 Ala. 158 , 43 So.2d 409 (1949). “In Atkinson v. … “In the case of Jackson v.

Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile

264 Ala. 56 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 28, 1955

As stated above, the individuals composing the personnel board are named in the bill or petition, and two of the three members of the board signed the appeal bond. See Smith v. Collier, 210 Ala. 23 , 97 So. 101 . … The Act of 1939 made a limitation on that power and conferred it on the personnel board. Tyson v. Arn, 259 Ala. 681 , 68 So.2d 526 .

Hoover City Board of Education v. Jefferson County

751 So. 2d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 11, 1998

The issue in this case is whether the 13.9-mill ad valorem tax levied by the Hoover City Board of Education (“Hoover’s tax”) falls within the definition of the phrase “the three-mill district school tax,” commonly known as

Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Board of Education

384 So. 2d 1103 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 27, 1980

Williams v. Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board

261 Ala. 460 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 1, 1954

Dean, 260 Ala. 221 , 69 So.2d 704 ; Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board of Montgomery v. Sullivan, 260 Ala. 214 , 69 So.2d 709 ; Oliver v. Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board, ante, p. 234, 73 So.2d 552 . … Town of Opp v. Donaldson, 230 Ala. 689 , 163 So. 332 . See-Chamberlain v. Board of Com’rs, 243 Ala. 662 , 11 So.2d 724 ; Harman v.

Holcomb Ex Rel. Holcomb v. Escambia County Hospital Board

291 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 12, 1973

The result of such action is stated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in White v. … In Stoke v.

Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar v. Jones

291 Ala. 371 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 2, 1973

Hodges v. Sublett, 91 Ala. 588 , 8 So. 800 . As far back as 1888, in the case of Houston v. … In the Florida case of State v. Young, 30 Fla. 85 , 11 So. 514 , we find this statement: “. . .

Consolidated Foods Corp. v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board

294 Ala. 518 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 25, 1975

It is general language granting the Board a right of ingress and egress across Consolidated’s property. City of Elizabethtown v. Caswell, 261 S.W.2d 424 (Ky.App.1953); Commonwealth v. … McGowin v. Cobb, 249 Ala. 561 , 32 So.2d 36 (1947).

City of Mobile v. Board of Water & Sewer Com'rs

258 Ala. 669 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 24, 1953

This court has held in Water Works Board of City of Mobile v. … Water Works Board of City of Mobile v. City of Mobile, supra.

Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. Talley

286 Ala. 661 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 4, 1971

Lancaster, 267 Ala. 366 , 102 So.2d 1 ; Cole v. Sylacauga Hospital Board, 269 Ala. 405 , 113 So.2d 200 ; Town of Warrior v. Blaylock, 271 Ala. 685 , 127 So.2d 618 ; City of Gadsden v. … Mellott v. [Board of Com’rs of] Wyandotte County, 128 Kan. 516 , 279 P. 1 ; Perry v. Elizabethton, 160 Tenn. 102 , 22 S.W.2d 359 .’ Holland v. Flinn, 239 Ala. 390, 392 , 195 So. 265 .” See also Dews v.

Smith v. WILCOX CTY. BD. OF EDUC.

365 So. 2d 659 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1978

Gill v. Stolow, 240 F.2d 669 (2nd Cir. 1957); Dabney v. Burrell, 67 F.R.D. 132 (D.Md.1975). Consequently, it appears that the plaintiff's conduct must mandate the dismissal. Brown v. Thompson, supra . … Pond v. Braniff Airways, Inc., supra ; Brown v. Thompson, supra . Finally, appellees argue that a lengthy period of inactivity may be sufficient to justify dismissal.

Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. Talley

291 Ala. 307 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 5, 1973

Masters v. Pruce, 290 Ala. 56 , 274 So.2d 33 (1973); Ethington v. Wright, 66 Ariz. 382 , 189 P.2d 209 (1948); Cummings v. Shipp, 156 Tenn. 595 , 3 S.W.2d 1062 (1928); Parr v. … McCraney v. City of Leeds, 241 Ala. 198 , 1 So.2d 894 (1941); Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of Birmingham, 234 Ala. 204 , 174 So. 609 (1937); Leary v.

Smiley v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar

286 Ala. 216 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 16, 1970

Dobbins, 255 Ala. 671 , 53 So.2d 549 ; Adams v. Logan, 260 Ala. 346 , 70 So.2d 786 ; Carnegie v. Carnegie, 261 Ala. 146 , 73 So.2d 556 ; Loveman v. Lay, 271 Ala. 385 , 124 So.2d 93 ; Norden v. … See Paradiso v. Board of Commissioners of Alabama State Bar, 284 Ala. 450 , 225 So.2d 855 .

Jaffe Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of Sheffield

361 So. 2d 563 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 14, 1978

Water Works Board of Town of Parrish v. White

281 Ala. 357 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 14, 1967

Birmingham Water Works Co. v. Brown, 191 Ala. 457 , 67 So. 613 , L.R.A. 1915D, 1086 ; Griffin v. … Jackson v. Hubbard, 256 Ala. 114 , 53 So.2d 723 .

Worley v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

407 So. 2d 822 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 11, 1981

The scope of review to which this Court must adhere in these cases was settled in Hunt v. … Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 381 So.2d 52 (Ala.1980): “Under the present rules of disciplinary enforcement, where the members oí the Disciplinary Board hear the evidence and observe the demeanor of the witnesses

County Board of Education v. Cement Products Co.

209 Ala. 310 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 26, 1923

In Kenan v. … Law (2d Ed.) 125, 134, 138; Hodges v. Sublett, 91 Ala. 588 ; Horst v. Moses, 48 Ala. 140 ; Sanford v. Howard, 29 Ala. 684 .” ' See Sturdivant v. Mt. Dixie S. L. & I. Co., 197 Ala. 280 , 72 South. 502 ; Huntsville Gro.

Hayes v. Mobile County Board of School Commissioners

405 So. 2d 366 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 27, 1981

possessed of no Roth rights to a hearing and reasons for terminating his employment, but to the contrary would hold that if, indeed, he was possessed of any such rights the contract entered into by him with the Mobile County Board

State ex rel. Bowen v. Board of Education

258 Ala. 709 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 17, 1952

J., and BROWN, FOSTER and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Capital City Water Co. v. Board of Revenue

92 Ala. 380 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1890

It seems that a bill of exceptions was taken on this trial before the Board of Revenue and made a part of its record which was carried into the .circuit court by certiorari. … —Code, §§ 475, 478, 515; Acts 1886-7, p. 11; State v. Bienville Water Supply Co., 89 Ala. 323 ; 8 So. Rep. 54 .