Opinion

Claasen v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 30, 1999
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2841

FRANS G. CLAASEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs;

THOMAS H. WEAVER; NORMAN H. STIER, JR.; NANCY

THOMPSON, Medical Director, U.S. Veterans

Affairs Medical Center; BARBARA GALLAGHER,

Regional Director, U.S. Department of Veterans

Affairs; FRANCIS J. CITRO, M.D., Chief of

Staff, U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Center;

MEREDITH RICHMOND, M.D., Associate Chief of

Staff, Ambulatory Care, U.S. Veterans Affairs

Medical Center; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS; VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-

trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-96-35-3)

Submitted: August 17, 1999 Decided: August 30, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frans G. Claasen, Appellant Pro Se. Diane M. Sullivan, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Daniel W. Dickin-

son, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Frans G. Claasen appeals the district court’s order affirming

the decision of the Disciplinary Appeal Board to uphold Claasen’s

discharge from employment as a physician at the United States

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Martinsburg, West

Virginia. We have reviewed the record and the district court opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Claasen v. Brown, No. CA-96-

35-3 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 17, 1998); see also 38 U.S.C. § 7462(f)

(1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.