Opinion

Painter, Bradley v. American Mechanical Contractors Incorporated

  • 2024 TN WC 41
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
May 21, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Brian K. Addington
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

May 21, 2024

07:39 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT GRAY

BRADLEY PAINTER, ) Docket Number: 2024-20-1769

Employee, )

v. )

AMERICAN MECHANICAL )

CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED, ) State File Number: 68810-2023

Employer, )

And )

BUILDERS MUTUAL INSURANCE )

COMPANY, ) Judge Brian K. Addington

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing on May 16, 2024, to determine whether Mr.

Painter is likely to prevail at trial that he is entitled to medical benefits for his left-shoulder

injury. Based on the evidence presented, the Court holds that Mr. Painter is not likely to

prevail at trial and his request for benefits is denied.

Claim History

Mr. Painter is a machinist at American Mechanical. On August 15, 2023, he and a

co-worker attempted to lift a heavy fifth wheel hitch elevator onto a set of sawhorses. His

co-worker did not lift the elevator as Mr. Painter intended, and this caused him to shift his

arm into a different position.1 He testified that he felt a “rip” in his left shoulder as he lifted

the elevator.

Stanley Arnold, Safety Director for American Mechanical, testified that Mr. Painter

reported a burning feeling in his left shoulder that day. He further stated that Mr. Painter

1

Mr. Painter was working with lifting restrictions due to a right-shoulder work injury that occurred one

month earlier.

1

told him his left shoulder began hurting after doing yard work several days before the

alleged injury. He sent Mr. Painter to a clinic for his injury.

The clinic referred Mr. Painter to an orthopedist, and he chose Dr. Jeffrey France

from a panel. Dr France ordered an MRI that showed a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, so

he ordered surgery.

American Mechanical did not approve the surgery, contending that the medical

proof did not show that his alleged injury was the primary cause of his left-shoulder

condition or need for surgery. It further argued that Mr. Painter’s left-shoulder problem

was preexisting because medical records dated shortly before the alleged injury noted that

both shoulders are “wrecked,” and that he reported left-shoulder pain at least eight days

before the date of injury.2

Mr. Painter agreed on cross-examination that the medical records showed he

complained of pain in his left shoulder at the clinic, but he disagreed that he told the clinic

staff that both shoulders were wrecked. He testified that his left arm continues to hurt, and

he is limited in how far he can move it and the work he can do.

The parties deposed Dr. France, who testified that when considering whether an

injury is new, he looks to the MRI to see the amount of blood or fluid collected around the

tear. He compared the images of Mr. Painter’s right and left shoulders. He stated, “Even

when I looked at it, there was a little more fluid around the right one. So, it’s harder to

swear the left one might not be a more chronic condition.”

He added that retraction can also suggest an acute injury. He noted that, “[w]ith that

much retraction, there may have been some element of tear before. [W]ith a 3.9-centimeter

tear, that somehow . . . has been there before unless you just see all this blood and fluid. . .

. I did not see that in the left shoulder.”

The parties also asked whether Mr. Painter could have aggravated a preexisting

condition. The last question to Dr. France did not use the statutory “more likely than not”

language. Instead, counsel asked, “That’s as likely not what happened as any other cause.

Is that correct?”3 Dr. France’s answer was “Yes. I guess[.]”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Painter must prove he is likely to prevail at a final hearing on his requested

benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human

Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

2

These medical records were from a compensable right shoulder workers’ compensation injury.

3

The Court is unsure of the exact meaning of this question because it was posed as a negative.

2

This case comes down to whether Dr. France, the authorized treating physician,

primarily related Mr. Painter’s current left-shoulder condition and the need for surgery to

the work incident. His causation opinion is rebuttably presumed correct. Tenn. Code. Ann.

§ 50-6-102(12)(E). Both acute injuries and aggravations of preexisting injuries may be

compensable. Id.at -102(12)(A).

Dr. France repeatedly stated that Mr. Painter’s shoulder injury appeared to be old

because it had retracted. He stated an acute injury could also retract, but the MRI image

would show more blood and fluid in the shoulder than he saw in Mr. Painter’s imaging.

Further complicating matters for Dr. France was Mr. Painter’s minor complaints of

left-shoulder pain before the injury. Although he did mention pain, and the notes stated his

shoulders were “wrecked” before the injury, no comprehensive medical records were

presented that predate the injuries Mr. Painter suffered at work. Thus, the Court cannot

determine whether Mr. Painter injured his shoulder in the past and the extent of the injury,

if any, or whether he simply experienced everyday pain in his left shoulder.

To answer the question, the parties asked Dr. France if Mr. Painter could have

aggravated a preexisting condition in his left shoulder. Dr. France was equivocal

throughout. His answer to the last question, “Yes. I guess,” is similarly noncommital.

The medical evidence, at this time, suggests that Dr. France did not affirmatively

state that Mr. Painter suffered an acute injury or aggravation of a preexisting condition

primarily arising out of his work. Thus, the Court holds Mr. Painter is not likely to prevail

at trial about his left-shoulder injury and the need for surgery.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED:

1. Mr. Painter’s claim against American Mechanical for the requested benefits is

denied at this time.

2. The parties shall appear for a Status Hearing on June 26, 2024, at 2:00 p.m.

Eastern. You must call 855-543-5044. Failure to call in may result in a

determination of the issues without your further participation.

Entered May 21, 2024.

______________________________________

BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Bradley Painter

2. Declaration of Stanley Arnold

3. Causation opinion questionnaire by Dr. France

4. Occupational Medicine Clinic Visit

5. Watauga Orthopaedics

6. Deposition of Dr. Jeffrey France

7. Photo (elevator)

8. Photo (scales)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent on May 21, 2024.

Name Certified Fax Email Service sent to:

Mail

Daniel Minor, X dan@danielbminor.com

Employee’s Attorney maria@danielbminor.com

Jeffery Foster, X jfoster@morganakins.com

Employer’s Attorney jtallent@morganakins.com

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

 If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

 If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.