The opinion
FILED
May 07, 2024
11:03 AM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT NASHVILLE
Solomon Demissie, ) Docket No. 2023-06-2358
Employee, )
v. )
N & S, Inc., ) State File No. 9505-2023
Employer, )
And )
Hanover Insurance Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
Carrier. )
COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
N & S, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment contending that no genuine issues
of material fact exist about whether Solomon Demissie’s current condition arises primarily
out of employment and whether he has a permanent impairment. After an April 30 hearing,
the Court grants the motion as to Mr. Demissie’s request for additional medical and
permanent disability benefits, but he remains entitled to future medical benefits.
Claim History
Mr. Demissie, a mechanic, filed a petition for benefit determination alleging he
injured his hip in an auto accident while test-driving a vehicle. He initially treated on his
own and settled a third-party claim for the accident. N & S eventually accepted the claim
and offered a panel of orthopedists. Mr. Demissie selected Dr. Forrest Allen and saw him
once in May 2023.
Later, Mr. Demissie requested an expedited hearing seeking additional medical and
temporary disability benefits. After a December 2023 hearing, the Court ordered that N &
S authorize a return visit with Dr. Allen but denied Mr. Demissie’s request for additional
disability benefits. Neither party appealed, and Mr. Demissie returned to the doctor in
January 2024.
At a February status hearing, Mr. Demissie announced his intention to request
another expedited hearing seeking an order for N & S to authorize pain management
1
recommended by Dr. Allen. N & S argued he was not entitled to pain management because
Dr. Allen said that treatment was not related to the work accident. The Court cautioned
Mr. Demissie at that time that if he wanted N & S to pay for pain management, he must
offer medical proof that the need for it is work-related. For its part, N & S stated that it
planned to move for summary judgment.
Mr. Demissie later filed a hearing request and records from an unauthorized pain
management physician. Those records included a statement from the doctor that she
declined to complete a C-32 form because she did “not feel comfortable with the full scope
of this documentation.”
N & S filed this summary judgment motion. Considering the pain management
doctor’s opinion, the Court declined to set an evidentiary hearing on Mr. Demissie’s
request and proceeded with this hearing.
The motion and parties’ positions
N & S filed a statement of undisputed material facts, summarized below.
1. Mr. Demissie was N & S’s employee on October 3, 2022, when he was involved
in a motor vehicle accident arising out of the course and scope of his
employment.
2. Dr. Allen is the panel-selected authorized physician.
3. On May 23, 2023, Dr. Allen wrote that Mr. Demissie was able to work at full
capacity.
4. Dr. Allen placed Mr. Demissie at maximum medical improvement and assigned
no permanent impairment.
5. On January 5, 2024, Dr. Allen saw Mr. Demissie again and gave the opinion that
Mr. Demissie’s complaints were not causally related to the work injury of
October 3, 2022.
6. Dr. Allen further stated that no additional treatment is available for Mr. Demissie
that would be related to the work injury.
N & S supports these facts by citation to the record, which includes Dr. Allen’s
affidavit. N & S argues no factual dispute exists as to Mr. Demissie’s entitlement to
additional benefits.
Mr. Demissie did not file a response to the motion, but he argues that his pain from
the work accident persists and he is unable to work. He disagrees with Dr. Allen’s
conclusions.
Law and Analysis
2
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there
is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment
as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2023).
As the moving party, N & S must do one of two things to prevail on its motion: (1)
submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Demissie’s claim, or
(2) demonstrate that the evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of Mr.
Demissie’s claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2023); see also Rye v. Women’s Care
Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 488 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).
If N & S does either or both, Mr. Demissie must respond by producing specific facts
showing a genuine issue for trial. Id.; Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.06. If he fails to do so, “summary
judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against [him].” Id.
N & S argues that summary judgment is appropriate because it demonstrated that
Mr. Demissie’s current complaints did not arise out of employment and he did not sustain
any permanent impairment.
Mr. Demissie expresses a sincerely-held belief that his current condition relates to
the work accident. However, he offers no expert opinion to rebut N & S’s proof. He did
not show the work-relatedness of his current complaints or that he sustained any permanent
impairment. Mr. Demissie’s belief is argument not proof. See Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co.,
2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 8, at *17 (Feb. 14, 2018) (parties cannot rely solely
on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their
arguments).
Therefore, based on the undisputed facts, N & S has negated an essential element of
any claim for permanent disability by showing there is no proof of permanent impairment.
Likewise, because Dr. Allen says Mr. Demissie’s current complaints do not arise primarily
out of his employment, N & S has negated the essential element of Mr. Demissie’s claim
for additional medical treatment at this time.
However, the Court disagrees with N & S’s contention that, since Dr. Allen stated
no future treatment is necessary, Mr. Demissie is not entitled to future medical benefits.
An employee who suffers a compensable injury is entitled to any reasonable, necessary,
and work-related medical treatment. Tenn. Code. Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). The Court
might later be tasked with determining whether N & S is responsible for further medical
treatment for Mr. Demissie’s compensable injury. See Reynolds v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,
No. 02S01-9203-CH-00027, 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 620, at *4-5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.
Panel Oct. 7, 1992) (“If and when application is made for any such future medical expenses,
the trial judge will at that time and under the evidence then adduced have to determine
whether the employer or its insurance carrier is liable for the payment of such expenses.”).
3
In sum, N & S is entitled to summary judgment on the issues of permanent disability
and the absence of need for current medical treatment. Mr. Demissie remains entitled to
medical benefits in the future, the need for which must be determined at the time they are
requested.
IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. N & S is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law regarding the
immediate provision of additional medical treatment and the payment of
permanent disability benefits. Those claims are dismissed with prejudice.
2. N & S shall furnish reasonable, necessary, and work-related future medical
benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204.
3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to N & S, to be paid to the Court Clerk
under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-06 (2023)
within five business days of this order becoming final.
4. N & S shall file Form SD-2 with the clerk within ten business days after this
order becomes final.
5. Unless appealed, this Order shall become final 30 days after entry.
ENTERED May 7, 2024.
________________________________________
JUDGE KENNETH M. SWITZER
Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on May 7, 2024.
Name Regular mail Email Sent to
Solomon Demissie, X X demissolo@gmail.com
Employee 5424 Oak Chase Drive
Antioch, TN 37013
Kitty Boyte, X kitty.boyte@petersonwhite.com
Employer’s Attorney denise.mccorkle@petersonwhite.com
_______________________________________
Penny Shrum
Clerk, Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
5
Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation
Appeals Board. To do so, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the
Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.
If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the
order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed
within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.
If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues
in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of
the date the Compensation Order was filed.
When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,
if represented).
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar
days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office
or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an
Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)
seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency
within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing
fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.
3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court
reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio
recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your
appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of
the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the
Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,
and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of
transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the
Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)
4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits
it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.
If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order
becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory
orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).
For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
Docket No.: ________________________
State File No.: ______________________
Date of Injury: _____________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Employee
v.
___________________________________________________________________________
Employer
Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
Statement of the Issues on Appeal
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Parties
Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
Email: __________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
Email: _________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
______________________________________________
[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082