The opinion
Board of Mgrs. of the Hampton House Condominium
v IPark U, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 31187(U)
April 8, 2024
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket Number: Index No. 158771/2021
Judge: Mary V. Rosado
Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York
State and local government sources, including the New
York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.
This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official
publication.
INDEX NO. 158771/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M
Justice
·------------X INDEX NO. 158771/2021
BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE
MOTION DATE 12/19/2023
CONDOMINIUM
Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002
-v-
DECISION + ORDER ON
lPARK U, INC.,
MOTION
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 24, 25, 27, 30, 32,
33, 34, 35, 36, 37
were read on this motion to/for STRIKE PLEADINGS
Upon the foregoing documents, there being no opposition and good cause having been
shown, Plaintiff Board of Managers of the Hampton House Condominium's ("Plaintiff')
December 19, 2023 motion for an Order striking Defendant !Park U, Inc's ("Defendant")
December 13, 2021 Answer (NSYCEF Doc. 35) and granting default judgment against Defendant
and in favor of Plaintiff for the relief sought in Plaintiff's Verified Complaint (NYSCEF Doc. 34)
is granted.
I. Background
Pursuant to the May 13, 2023 Preliminary Conference Order Plaintiff and Defendant were
directed to serve any demands for discovery and inspection on or before July 15, 2023, and to
serve responses to those demands "as per CPLR" (NYSCEF Doc. 24). Subsequently, Plaintiff filed
a Notice of Demand for Discovery and Inspection on July 24, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. 36). Pursuant
to CPLR 3120(2), Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Discovery and Inspection Notice was to be
served along with any responsive documents on or before August 14, 2023. After Defendant failed
158771/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE CONDOMINIUM vs. !PARK U, Page 1 of 5
INC.
Motion No. 002
1 of 5
[* 1]
INDEX NO. 158771/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2024
to respond to Plaintiffs Discovery and Inspection Notice by August 14, 2023, Defendant sent
Plaintiff good faith emails on August 15, 2023 and August 16, 2023 seeking a response to the
Discovery and Inspection Notice (NYSCEF Doc. 33 at 3). Plaintiff did not respond to either of
Defendant's August emails (NSYCEF Doc. 33 at 3).
Subsequently, a Compliance Conference Order dated September 20, 2023 ordered
Defendant, inter alia, to respond to Plaintiffs July 24, 2023 Discovery and Inspection Notice by
October 20, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. 27). Despite this Order, Defendant did not serve any response
to the Discovery and Inspection Notice on or before October 20, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. 33 at ,i 9).
On October 24, 2023 Plaintiffs counsel sent another email to Defendant's counsel seeking
a response to Plaintiffs Discovery and Inspection Notice, and if a response was not received that
Plaintiff would seek to schedule a pre-motion discovery conference (NYSCEF Doc. 33 at ,i 9).
On November 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for leave to file a discovery motion in this
action (NYSCEF Docs. 28-29). On November 3, 2023, the Court issued a Decision and Order
conditionally granting Plaintiff leave to make a discovery motion in the event that Defendant "fails
to file a response to Plaintiffs First Notice of Demand for Discovery and Inspection, dated July
24, 2023 ... by December 1, 2023" (NYSCEF Doc. 30).
To date, Defendant has failed to provide any response to Plaintiffs Discovery and
Inspection Notice. Accordingly, Plaintiff commenced the instant motion on December 19, 2023
seeking an Order striking Defendant's December 13, 2021 Answer (NSYCEF Doc. 35) and
granting default judgment against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiff for the relief sought in
Plaintiffs Verified Complaint (NYSCEF Doc. 34). Defendant has not filed any opposition to
Plaintiffs motion.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]
158771/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE CONDOMINIUM vs. IPARK U, Page 2 of 5
INC.
Motion No. 002
2 of 5
[* 2]
INDEX NO. 158771/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2024
II. Discussion
A. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendant's Answer and Enter Default Judgment
against Defendant, is Granted
CPLR 3126(3) authorizes a court to strike pleadings where a party "refused to obey an
order for disclosure or willfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have
been disclosed." The First Department has held that the repeated violation of discovery orders
constitutes a pattern of noncompliance giving rise "to an inference of willful and contumacious
conduct" warranting the imposition of sanctions pursuant to CPLR 3126 (Cooper v Metropolitan
Transp. Auth., 186 AD3d 1150 [1st Dept 2020]).
Here, Defendant has failed to provide the discovery ordered by the May 13, 2023
Preliminary Conference Order (NYSCEF Doc. 24), the September 20, 2023 Compliance
Conference Order (NYSCEF Doc. 27) and the Decision and Order dated November 3, 2023
(NYSCEF Doc. 30), and failed to respond to no less than three good faith letters sent by Plaintiffs
counsel. In light of the foregoing, Defendant is held in default, and its answer is stricken.
B. Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant for the Relief Requested m
Plaintiffs Complaint is Proper
It is well settled that "[w]hen an answer is stricken and a default entered, the defendant
'admits all traversable allegations in the complaint, including the basic allegation of liability, but
does not admit the plaintiffs conclusion as to damages' ... unless the damages are for a sum which
can be made certain by computation" (Curiale v Adra Ins. Co., 88 NY2d 268,279 [1996] quoting
Rokina Optical Co. v Camera King, Inc., 63 NY2d 728, 730 [1984]). The Court of Appeals has
held that the term "sum certain" "contemplates a situation in which, once liability has been
established, there can be no dispute as to the amount due, as in actions on money judgments and
158771/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE CONDOMINIUM vs. IPARK U, Page 3 of 5
INC.
Motion No. 002
3 of 5
[* 3]
INDEX NO. 158771/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2024
negotiable instruments" (Reynolds Secur., Inc. v Underwriters Bank & Trust Co. 44 NY2d 568,
572 [1978]).
Here, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Complaint seeks a monetary judgment of $200,000.00
with prejudgment interest (NYSCEF Doc. 34 at ,i 13). In accordance with the above outlined
criteria, the $200,000.00 sum sought by Plaintiff constitutes a sum certain. Accordingly, an inquest
is not needed, and Plaintiffs motion for a judgment on default in the sum of $200,000.00, with
prejudgment interest, is granted against Defendant.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Plaintiff Board of Manager of the Hampton House Condominium's
December 19, 2023 motion for an Order striking Defendant !Park U, Inc.'s December 13, 2021
Answer and granting a default judgment against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiff for the relief
sought in Plaintiffs Verified Complaint, is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff Board of Manager of the Hampton House Condominium's
motion for a money judgment on default against Defendant !Park U, Inc. is granted in the amount
of $200,000.00, plus statutory interest from September 24, 2021 (the commencement of this
action) through entry of judgment, as calculated by the Clerk of the Court, together with costs and
disbursements as taxed by the Clerk of the Court upon submission of an appropriate bill of costs;
and it is further
ORDERED that within ten (10) days of entry, counsel for Plaintiff Board of Manager of
the Hampton House Condominium shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order, with notice of
entry, upon Defendant !Park U, Inc.; and it is further
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]
158771/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE CONDOMINIUM vs. IPARK U, Page 4 of 5
INC.
Motion No. 002
4 of 5
[* 4]
INDEX NO. 158771/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2024
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
4/8/2024
DATE HON. MARY V. ROSADO, J.S.C.
CHECK ONE: x CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
x GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSl'ER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
158771/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE HAMPTON HOUSE CONDOMINIUM vs. IPARK U, Page 5 of 5
INC.
Motion No. 002
5 of 5
[* 5]