Opinion

In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Paul L. Friedman
Nature of suit
Magistrate Case
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE )

ANTITRUST LITIGATION )

) MDL Docket No. 1869

) Miscellaneous No. 07-0489 (PLF)

This document relates to: )

)

ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CASES )

)

ORDER

In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred to Judge

Beryl Howell, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant BNSF Railway Company’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. No. 1030], Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. No. 1031], Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. No. 1032], and Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company’s Motion for

Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1033] are denied without prejudice to their being refiled before

Judge Howell.!

SO ORDERED.

Lf

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: 3/2: | a+

; The individual cases that make up MDL Docket No. 1869 are Strates Shows, Inc.

v. Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07-1127; Donnelly Commodities, Inc. v.

Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07- 1515; Dust Pro, Inc. v. CSX

Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2061; Zinifex Taylor Chemicals, Inc. v. CSX

Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2062; and US Magnesium LLC v. CSX Transportation,

Inc., Civil Action No. 07- 2116.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.