Opinion

Scott, Kawanda v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.

  • 2023 TN WC 95
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Status
Published
On the bench
Shaterra Reed Marion
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Dec 15, 2023

02:20 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

KAWANDA SCOTT, ) Docket No.: 2023-08-0096

Employee, )

v. )

RENT-A-CENTER, INC., ) State File No.: 76871-2021

Employer, )

And )

EVEREST PREMIER INS. CO., ) Judge Shaterra R. Marion

Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

The Court held an expedited hearing on December 13, 2023, on Ms. Scott’s request

for medical and temporary disability benefits for ulnar neuritis. The Court denies her

request because the authorized treating physician determined that Ms. Scott’s current

condition is not primarily related to her workers’ compensation injury. 1

History of Claim

Ms. Scott testified that she fell backwards at work while rolling a king size mattress

into the store on a dolly on October 1, 2021. 2 She testified that Rent-A-Center provided

her a panel, from which she chose Concentra. She presented with pain in her tailbone and

her upper right neck. X-rays showed no significant findings, and her doctor assigned

physical therapy and placed her on light-duty work.

1

Rent-A-Center seeks repayment for a $18,059.35 temporary total disability overpayment. However, the

parties agreed this issue is more appropriate for a compensation hearing. Thus, the Court declines to rule

on overpayment.

2

Randy Ganger, a delivery driver not employed by Rent-A-Center but present at the time of the injury,

testified by Zoom about what happened on the date of the injury. However, because the events of October

1, 2021, are not in dispute, the Court will not summarize his testimony here.

According to Ms. Scott’s testimony, Rent-A-Center did not accommodate her

restrictions, so she continued working full duty. After she experienced continuing pain,

Concentra ordered MRIs, which came back with no acute findings. Eventually she stopped

working and participated in physical therapy. The physical therapy only granted slight

relief, so Concentra referred her to Dr. Keith Williams, an orthopedic doctor.

Ms. Scott testified she requested Dr. Williams because he previously performed her

unrelated cervical fusion. Rent-A-Center accepted the referral.

Dr. Williams ordered an EMG, which came back normal. He also ordered a

functional capacity exam, which showed Ms. Scott’s ability to work at medium duty level.

He placed Ms. Scott at maximum medical improvement with a zero percent rating on

February 18, 2022, and noted that she would need future medical treatment.

Ms. Scott next saw Dr. Salman Saeed, who gave her a left elbow injection about a

year after she was placed at maximum medical improvement. Ms. Scott briefly mentioned

that she experienced her current symptoms of left elbow pain and numbness after her fall

at work. Dr. Saeed also noted her normal MRI and EMG. Dr. Saeed’s treatment was not

authorized.

Ms. Scott also saw Dr. Robert Jeffrey Cole, who referred her for another EMG,

which showed mild ulnar neuritis at her left elbow. Dr. Cole’s records were not submitted

to the Court.

A later note by Dr. William Weller, another orthopedist, stated that Dr. Cole

determined that Ms. Scott only had mild symptoms that did not require surgery.

Ms. Scott returned to Dr. Williams a month after the second EMG. He stated in a

letter that “it is my professional opinion that the ulnar neuritis Mrs. Scott is currently

experiencing is not related to the worker’s compensation injury she sustained to her neck

and back on 10/01/21.”

Dr. Chris Connelly conducted a records review at Ms. Scott’s request. He diagnosed

a left elbow injury, cubital tunnel syndrome, and ulnar neuropathy. He assessed a two

percent impairment rating and stated that, due to her developing condition, impairment

would be updated in six months to one year. Dr. Connelly did not address causation for

Ms. Scott’s diagnosed injuries.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Scott must show she is likely to prevail at trial in establishing that her injuries

arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-102(12); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

In this case, Rent-A-Center offered the opinion of Dr. Williams, who specifically

said Ms. Scott’s work injury did not cause her current ulnar neuritis. Dr. Williams, as the

authorized panel physician, is presumed correct regarding causation. Tenn. Code. Ann. §

50-6-102(12)(E).

Ms. Scott offered two expert opinions to rebut Dr. Williams. However, Dr.

Connelly’s report does not offer an opinion on causation, and Dr. Saeed’s only briefly

mentions that Ms. Scott’s continuing symptoms began in October 2021. These two

opinions fall short of showing her elbow injury was primarily work-related, so her proof is

insufficient to rebut the presumption afforded Dr. Williams.

Thus, the court holds that Ms. Scott is not likely to prevail at trial in establishing

that her ulnar neuritis arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her

employment. 3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Scott’s request for medical and temporary benefits is denied.

2. The court sets a status conference on January 29, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. Central

Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call might

result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED December 15, 2023.

________________________________________

Judge Shaterra R. Marion

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

Ms. Scott requested that she be allowed to treat with her unauthorized physicians. However, Dr. Williams

has not declined to treat her, so he continues to be her authorized treating physician. Limberakis v. Pro-

Tech Sec., Inc., 2017 TN. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *8-10 (Sept. 12, 2017).

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Joint-Filed Medical Records

2. Wage Statement

3. Payment Ledger

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Hearing with Affidavit of Kawanda Scott

4. Order Setting Expedited Hearing

5. Order Granting Motion for Witness to Appear by Video Call

6. Subpoena of Witness Appearing by Video Call

7. Employer’s Pre-Hearing Brief

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on December 15, 2023.

Name Email Sent to

Femi Salu, X salu@salulawfirm.com

Employee’s Attorney

Kenneth D. Veit, X kenny.veit@leitnerfirm.com

Employer’s Attorney crystal.brown@leitnerfirm.com

_______________________________________

Penny Shrum

Clerk, Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.