Opinion

United States v. Christopher Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 21, 2023
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7127 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER DONNELL BROWN, a/k/a Stymie, a/k/a Stimey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00350-JFA-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Donnell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7127 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Donnell Brown appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion

to correct a clerical error in his presentence report and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:17-cr-

00350-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2022; Sept. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.