Opinion

O'Reilly v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 510 F.2d 428
  • 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3278
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jan 17, 1975
Status
Published
On the bench
Browning, Chambers, Sharp
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 69.2%

The opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, 412 U.S. 67 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 752 (1973). Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 504 v. O’Reilly, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 36 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).

In No. 71 — 1853, we continue to adhere to those portions of our opinion, reported at 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1972), holding that the Board properly defined the issues before it and that the “no-strike” provision of the collective bargaining agreement had no application to the honoring of a sister union’s lawful picket line.

As for the other issue in the case, the Supreme Court has settled that it is *429 not within the purview of the Board’s responsibility to review the reasonableness of disciplinary fines imposed by unions upon their members. N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, supra.

Accordingly, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied.

In No. 26,892, the single issue presented is that which is now concluded by Boeing. Therefore, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.