Opinion

Brown v. Culnon

  • 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 66
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Feb 15, 1763
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 21.3%

The opinion

UPON a special Verdict, which was: “The “Jury find that the Overseers of the Poor in “the Absence of the Defendant and without his “Request advanced for the necessary Support of the “Defendant’s Wife and Children a certain Sum, and “if by Law the Plaintiff as Treasurer of the Town “ought to recover the same back from the Defendant, they find for the Plaintiff—otherwise, for the “Defendant.”

Judgment that the Defendant is liable. ( 1 )

(1) S. P. Hanover v. Turner, 14 Mass. 227 . New Bedford v. Chace, 5 Gray, 28 . But the town cannot recover for supplies suitable to the wife’s condition in life, beyond her necessary support as a pauper. Monson v. Williams, 6 Gray, 416 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.