Opinion

Washington v. New York City Board of Estimate

  • 464 U.S. 1013
  • 104 S. Ct. 537
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Dec 5, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
Certiorari
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 55.8%

suggesting that ERISA does not require excess assets to follow spun-off employees because there is no requirement under ERISA that those employees must receive the benefit of excess assets

How later courts described this case

  • suggesting that ERISA does not require excess assets to follow spun-off employees because there is no requirement under ERISA that those employees must receive the benefit of excess assets
  • excess assets need not follow spunoff employees because “no requirement [under ERISA] that employees receive the benefit of excess assets”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.