"[N]o [ Burford ] argument can be entertained based on disruption of a state administrative scheme in a case in which the court is asked to decide whether the very existence of that scheme violates a paramount federal statute"
How later courts described this case
- "[N]o [ Burford ] argument can be entertained based on disruption of a state administrative scheme in a case in which the court is asked to decide whether the very existence of that scheme violates a paramount federal statute"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Appeals from C. A. 3d Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 815 .