applying the standard of abused discretion to decision involving voir dire
How later courts described this case
- applying the standard of abused discretion to decision involving voir dire
- noting that the dissimilarity between the facts in the hypothetical and those of that actual trial is a factor to consider
- complaint regarding failure to admonish on range of punishment is constitutionally based requiring review under Rule 44.2(a)
- involuntariness complaints based on failures to admonish are constitutionally based requiring review under Rule 44.2(a)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.