affirming award of sanctions on basis of Bankruptcy Rule 9011, while still not addressing issue of jurisdiction under § 1927
How later courts described this case
- affirming award of sanctions on basis of Bankruptcy Rule 9011, while still not addressing issue of jurisdiction under § 1927
- upholding bankruptcy court’s sanction against attorney for reasserting arguments made in numerous other pleadings
- bankruptcy judge had jurisdiction to sanction claimant’s attorney since sanction itself was “core” proceeding in which bankruptcy judge could enter final order
- "Although we upheld a bankruptcy court’s imposition of a sanction under § 1927 [in TCI Ltd.] ... we did not discuss the court's jurisdiction to impose the sanction.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.