holding punitive damages assessed for fraud dischargeable pursuant to subsection (a)(2), but distinguishing punitive damages assessed for willful and malicious injury pursuant to subsection (a)(6) as nondis-chargeable
How later courts described this case
- holding punitive damages assessed for fraud dischargeable pursuant to subsection (a)(2), but distinguishing punitive damages assessed for willful and malicious injury pursuant to subsection (a)(6) as nondis-chargeable
- holding that “comments by decision-makers that denigrate those over forty” would be sufficient circumstantial evidence of animus in an age discrimination suit
- holding that punitive damages are nondis-chargeable under § 523(a)(6)
- “an examination of both the language of Section 523(a)(2) and the structure established in Section 523 as a whole supports the conclusion that Section 523(a)(2), unlike Sections 523(a)(4) and 523(a)(6), does not bar discharge of punitive damages”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.