stating that “[s]ection 109(f) was redesignat-ed section 109(g) by the Bankruptcy Judges, United States Trustees and Family Farmer Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-554. A conforming amendment to section 349(a) was inadvertently not enacted”.
How later courts described this case
- stating that “[s]ection 109(f) was redesignat-ed section 109(g) by the Bankruptcy Judges, United States Trustees and Family Farmer Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-554. A conforming amendment to section 349(a) was inadvertently not enacted”.
- 180 day preclusion from re-filings is the longest duration of such a ban by a bankruptcy court which can be authorized
- “[Bjecause it should have been clear to [Respondents] that associating with known members of organized crime would bring reproach upon the IBT, sanctioning them for these activities is not constitutionally infirm.”
- applying arbitrary and capricious standard to review of sanction involving health and welfare plans
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.