rejecting a claim because "[i]ncreased competition, in the sense of gaining a lower price or some other benefit for the consumer, could not be the result of an imposition of antitrust liability" in the circumstances
How later courts described this case
- rejecting a claim because "[i]ncreased competition, in the sense of gaining a lower price or some other benefit for the consumer, could not be the result of an imposition of antitrust liability" in the circumstances
- rejecting a claim because “[ijncreased competition, in the sense of gaining a lower price or some other benefit for the consumer, could not be the result of an imposition of antitrust liability” in the circumstances
- petition for review of EPA standards for the cleanup and disposal of uranium mill tailings originating from designated inactive mill sites
- challenge to EPA standards for active mill tail-ings sites
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.