“[E]ven one substantial claim may be enough to support jurisdiction”
How later courts described this case
- “[E]ven one substantial claim may be enough to support jurisdiction”
- failure to include guards or “safety devices at the ‘nip-point’ can constitute a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.