finding that principles of pendent jurisdiction allow a district court to consider state-law claims where a “Section 27” 8 claim is alleged and service on the defendants has been made pursuant to that federal statute
How later courts described this case
- finding that principles of pendent jurisdiction allow a district court to consider state-law claims where a “Section 27” 8 claim is alleged and service on the defendants has been made pursuant to that federal statute
- service was sufficient where marshal threw the papers over the defendant’s fence after ascertaining that the defendant lived at that address, photographed the papers on the defendant’s lawn, and sent a copy of the papers to the defendant’s address by first-class mail
- affirming summary judgment for defendants charged with an unlawful search and seizure where plaintiff failed to present particular allegations or evidence supporting her claim
- "there is much to be said in support of the view that, even if the terms of the convention were applicable, the convention was not intended to abrogate the methods of service prescribed by F.R.C.P. Rule 4”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Ct. App. Ohio, Guernsey County. Certiorari denied.