trucking company’s allegations that more circuitous trucking routes would injure environment in which they work was sufficient to sue under NEPA
How later courts described this case
- trucking company’s allegations that more circuitous trucking routes would injure environment in which they work was sufficient to sue under NEPA
- no adequate appellate remedy where judge orders that particular attorney may not represent certain witnesses before grand jury
- no adequate *477 appellate remedy where judge orders that particular attorney may not represent certain witnesses before grand jury
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Appeal from Ct. App. *1084 Ky. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.