state narcotics agent testified that the defendant “was engaged in narcotics activities” based on information gleaned from a number of sources, including an unnamed informant
How later courts described this case
- state narcotics agent testified that the defendant “was engaged in narcotics activities” based on information gleaned from a number of sources, including an unnamed informant
- Three and a half days' delay was not prejudicial
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.