Opinion

American Hospital Ass'n v. Hansbarger

  • 783 F.2d 1184
  • 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 27, 1986
Status
Published
On the bench
Butzner, Chapman, Sprouse
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

In 1983 the West Virginia legislature enacted what is now § 16-5B-6a of the West Virginia Code. This Act requires that on or before July 1, 1984, at least forty percent of the Board of Directors of all nonprofit and local government hospitals located in West Virginia must be composed of an equal proportion of “consumer representatives” from four categories: small business, organized labor, elderly persons, and persons whose income is less than the national median income. It provided: “Special consideration shall be made to select women, racial minorities and handicapped persons.” Id. § 16-5B-6a(c). The text of the bill includes an explanation of the legislature’s concern:

(a) The legislature declares that a crisis in health care costs exists, that one important approach to deal with this crisis is to have widespread citizen participation in hospital decision making and that many hospitals in West Virginia exclude from their boards important categories of consumers, including small businesses, organized labor, elderly persons and lower-income consumers. The legislature further declares that nonprofit hospitals receive such major revenue from public sources and are so crucial in health planning and development that it is necessary to require consumer representatives on their boards of directors. Therefore, the legislature determines *1185 that nonprofit hospitals and hospitals owned by local governments should have boards of directors representative of the communities they serve.

Id. § 16-5B-6a(a).

The Act goes on to provide the forty-percent requirement and the four categories mentioned above.

A number of non-profit hospitals and hospitals owned by a county, city, or other political subdivision, brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, challenging the statute on constitutional grounds. In a very well-reasoned opinion, the district court found that it was not required to pass upon the wisdom of the legislature in passing the challenged statute, but to determine whether the statute violated the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of West Virginia. The district court found no constitutional violations; we agree and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion reported as American Hospital Association v. Hansbarger, 600 F.Supp. 465 (N.D.W.Va.1984).

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.