Opinion

Spartan Equipment Co. v. Troitino & Brown, Inc.

  • 46 N.C. App. 343
  • 264 S.E.2d 759
  • 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2820
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Apr 15, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Hill
On the bench
Hill, Martin, Robert, Webb
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.9%

The opinion

HILL, Judge.

Appellant violated Rule 10(b) and (c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure by failing to number its exceptions in the record and by failing to list the exceptions after the assignments of error identified by their number and by pages in the record at which they appear. It further violated Appellate Rule 28(b)(1) by failing to give a statement of questions presented for review in its brief. It likewise failed to present the pertinent assignments of error and exceptions after each argument in its brief as required by Appellate Rule 28(b)(3). For these reasons, the appeal is subject to dismissal.

*344 Exceptions not preserved and set forth as required by the Rules are deemed abandoned. The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979).

For the reasons stated above, the appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges MARTIN (Robert M.) and WEBB concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.