holding that the Circuit was “in complete accord” with the district court’s determination that “[n]o constitutional question is involved in the Parole Board’s failure to give relator credit for time on parole and its adjustment of the expiration date of his new maximum.”
How later courts described this case
- holding that the Circuit was “in complete accord” with the district court’s determination that “[n]o constitutional question is involved in the Parole Board’s failure to give relator credit for time on parole and its adjustment of the expiration date of his new maximum.”
- expressing “complete accord” and affirming opinion of district court in United States ex rel. Heacock v. Myers, 251 F. Supp. 773, 774 (E.D. Pa. 1966
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court will be affirmed on the opinion filed in that court by Judge Joseph S. Lord, III, 251 F.Supp. 773 , with which we are in complete accord.