Opinion

United States v. Bunting

  • 82 F. 883
  • 1897 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89
Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Sep 21, 1897
Status
Published
Author
Butler
On the bench
Butler
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 96.5%

The opinion

BUTLER, District Judge

(orally). When this case first came before me, I was under the impression that the defendants were indicted under the old law, charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, and as it was not shown that either of them had defrauded the government of money or other property, I was in doubt whether the statute covered the charge. Since that time, however, I have carefully examined the bills of indictment as well as the sections of- the Revised Statutes under which the defendants are charged, and am of opinion that the offense comes within their terms.

Section 5418 literally as well as in spirit covers the case. The offense charged is a grave one; an attempt to prejudice the rights of the United States in the administration of the civil service statutes. Had the defendants been successful one of - them would have obtained a privilege which would have placed him in a favored class and have entitled him to an advantage over others in the appointment to office.

The privilege is a valuable one, and the fraud of the defendants was therefore in prejudice of the government.

The sections under which the defendants are indicted are broad and «weeping and the offense I think is within their provisions.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.