Opinion

Launtz v. Brown

  • 147 Ill. App. 99
  • 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 24
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Filed
Mar 4, 1909
Status
Published
Author
Myebs
On the bench
Myebs
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.2%

The opinion

Me. Presiding Justice Myebs delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case, appellant brought suit in attachment against appellee Brown, to recover a sum for rent claimed to be due, and levied upon certain personal property covered by two chattel mortgages held by appellee Piroved. Firoved filed an interpleader, claiming first lien upon the property attached by virtue of the chattel mortgages. Issues were joined and the case tried by jury, which returned the following verdict: “We the jury find the issues on the attachment in favor of the defendant Firoved,” and the court entered the following judgment: “It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court, that the attachment in this case be dissolved, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $162.15.” This is not in conformity with the issues joined and to be tried. The judgment does not conform to the verdict, and neither verdict nor judgment can be held to have determined the rights of all the parties to this action. For these reasons the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Barbour et al. v. White et al., 37 Ill. 164 ; Dow v. Battle, 12 Ill. 373 ; Mattson et al. v. Harnisch, 5 Ill. App. 102 ; Hackett v. Jones, 34 Ill. App. 562 . By the pleadings, statement of counsel and argument, two issues were submitted to the jury, one by traverse of appellant’s affidavit for attachment, and the other by traverse of appellee Firoved’s interpleader. The verdict is not responsive to either issue, and the judgment does not even purport to be on the verdict returned. It is therefore ineffectual as a conclusive determination of the rights of the parties and the matters in controversy. This much appears of record, and notwithstanding the failure of appellant to properly abstract the record and present the matter to this court, justice requires that the judgment be reversed. Numerous questions of law and fact are discussed by appellee in elaborate argument, which for want of sufficient abstract, and for the reason that it is unnecessary, we will not further consider.

Reversed cmd remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.