Opinion

United States v. Meyers

  • 190 F. 688
  • 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175
Court
District Court, D. Connecticut
Filed
Oct 9, 1911
Status
Published
Author
Platt
On the bench
Platt
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.5%

The opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The committee correctly interpreted the law as I find it to be, disregarding all evidence touching the question of special damage to the tenants Bernd and Huber, which might grow out of taking down, carrying away, and setting up again in a new location, the fixtures in their stores, which they had the right to remove, together with loss of profits during the céssation of business resulting from such removal. What the damage would have been, if said testimony had been taken into account, is therefore immaterial, and the alternative part of the report is of no service to the court.

Let judgment be entered, based upon the original findings of the committee.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.