Opinion

Riggs v. Brown

  • 172 F. 637
  • 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5833
Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Filed
May 13, 1909
Status
Published
Author
Noyes
On the bench
Noyes
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

The demurrers to the complaint are sustained, with costs. The want of the necessary diversity of citizenship is obvious.

Upon the argument the counsel for the complainants informally asked to amend by striking out the name of one of the parties complainant. In a supplemental brief he asks in an equally informal manner to be permitted to make certain other amendments. But the power of the court to allow the desired amendments, and the propriety of the exercise of the power, if existing, should only be determined upon regular application and due notice and hearing. I am unwilling to dismiss the bill without giving the complainants an opportunity to make such application; hut at present the only matter properly before me is the disposition of the demurrer.

The bill will be dismissed, with costs, unless within 30 days the complainants obtain leave to amend, and do amend, it by changing or rearranging the parties.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.