Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.

  • 298 F.R.D. 692
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60888
  • 2014 WL 1689292
Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Lammens
On the bench
Lammens
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 70.8%

granting judgment creditor’s motion to require judgment debtors to complete and serve post- judgment discovery

How later courts described this case

  • granting judgment creditor’s motion to require judgment debtors to complete and serve post- judgment discovery
  • granting judgment creditor's motion to require judgment debtors to complete and serve Form 1.977
  • granting judgment creditor's motion to require judgment debtors to complete Form 1.977

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Order

PHILIP R. LAMMENS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff American Home Assurance Company, Inc.’s Motion to Require Defendants Weaver and Beacon to Complete Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.977. (Doc. 242). Defendants Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc. (“Weaver”) and Beacon Industrial Staffing, Inc. (“Beacon”) have filed responses objecting to this Motion. (Docs. 254 & 255).

Plaintiff explains that judgment was entered in its favor and against Weaver and Beacon, jointly and severally, in the amount of $404,013.00. (Doc. 242). Plaintiff argues that, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.560(b), the Court should order Weaver and Beacon to complete Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.977 and the required attachments. As to Weaver’s and Beacon’s arguments that this motion is premature in light of the pending post-trial motions, Plaintiff asserts that it does not seek execution on the judgment at this stage, but rather, it merely is taking the first step to determine if and where Weaver and Beacon have assets.

Weaver responds that the cases on which Plaintiff relies are inapposite and that the Court should not require Weaver to engage in discovery in aid of execution at this point because favorable rulings on the pending post-trial motions could prevent collection of the judgment. (Doc. 254).

Beacon responds that Plaintiffs Motion is premature due to the fact that Beacon’s motion for judgment as a matter of law is still pending. (Doc. 255).

A judgment creditor “may obtain discovery from any person — including the judgment debtor — as provided in these rules or by the procedure of the state where the court is located.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a)(2). Under Florida law, “the court, at the request of the judgment creditor, shall order the judgment debtor or debtors to complete form 1.977, including all required attachments, within 45 days of the order or other such reasonable time as determined by the court.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.560(b). “On appropriate terms for the opposing party’s security, the court may stay the execution of a judgment — or any proceedings to enforce it — pending disposition” of post-trial motions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50, 52(b), 59, and 60. Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(b).

Here, judgment debtors Weaver and Beacon have presented no support for their argument that they should not be required to engage in discovery in aid of execution while their post-trial motions are pending. Nor has either party moved to stay the execution of the judgment under Rule 62. Accordingly, upon due consideration, Plaintiff American Home Assurance Company, Inc.’s Motion to Require Defendants Weaver and Beacon to Complete Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.977 (Doc. 242) is GRANTED. Defendants Weaver and Beacon shall complete and serve upon Plaintiffs counsel Form 1.977 and its required attachments on or before May 5, 2014.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.