Opinion

In re Richard

  • 104 F. 792
  • 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97
Court
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Filed
Nov 1, 1900
Status
Published
Author
Clark
On the bench
Clark
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.9%

The opinion

CLARK, District Judge.

In Hosmer v. Jewett, 12 Fed. Cas. 543 (No. 6,713), Judge Hall said:

“Money delivered to the bankrupt in trust, if earmarked or separately kept and retained as trust property, to be delivered or paid over in the same bills or coin in which it was received by the bankrupt, would not pass under the assignment, but would be considered ‘trust property’; but an amount of money due from the bankrupt as trustee, and which could not be distinguished from any other moneys in his possession or under his control, or which was only due from him because he had used trust funds for his own purposes, or otherwise misapplied them, could not be considered as ‘property’ held by the bankrupt in trust.”

This is undoubtedly the settled rule upon the subject. Loveland, Bankr. p. 324, and cases there cited. It is quite evident, in view of the law thus declared, that the conclusions at which the referee arrived are correct. His report is accordingly confirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.