Opinion

Laux v. Board of Supervisors

  • 654 F. App'x 129
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 10, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Keenan, King, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.0%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the contentions on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laux v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 , 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.