Opinion

United States v. Samuel

  • 627 F. App'x 213
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Dec 22, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Diaz, Hamilton, Harris
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.0%

The opinion

*214 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Otis Samuel, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Samuel’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and •find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 (D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.