Opinion

Brown v. Clarke

  • 589 F. App'x 138
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 2, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Gregory, Harris, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.0%

The opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for production of documents in his pending action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final *139 order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 'dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.