Opinion

Delaney v. Ashcraft

  • 295 F. App'x 115
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Filed
Oct 7, 2008
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.6%

citing, e.g. Neal v. St. Louis County Board of Police Commissioners 217 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir. 2000)

How later courts described this case

  • citing, e.g. Neal v. St. Louis County Board of Police Commissioners 217 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir. 2000)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

G.W. Delaney and Phyllis Delaney (the Delaneys) appeal following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment to the last remaining defendants in their civil-rights lawsuit. We reject as meritless the Delaneys’ various challenges to the district court’s well-reasoned determination that there were no trialworthy issues on the constitutional, conspiracy, and state-law claims against Detective Paul Norris, see Smith v. Insley’s Inc., 499 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir.2007) (summary judgment standard of review); and the Delaneys have waived all other claims by not addressing them in their opening brief, see K.D. v. County of Crow Wing, 434 F.3d 1051 , 1055 n. 4 (8th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.