Opinion

In re Rosenfield

  • 20 F. Cas. 1205
  • 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 319
Court
District Court, D. New Jersey
Filed
Jul 1, 1868
Status
Published
Author
Field
On the bench
Field
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FIELD, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the question propounded to the witness, and excluded by the register, was not a proper question to be put, for the reasons stated by the register in the foregoing, but am also of the opinion that under general order No. 10, the register had no power to decide on the competency, materiality, or relevancy of the question, and was therefore wrong in excluding it.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.