Opinion

In re O'Hara

  • 18 F. Cas. 622
  • 8 Am. Law Reg. 113
  • 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 326
Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 15, 1868
Status
Published
Author
McCandless
On the bench
McCandless
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 73.2%

The opinion

McCANDLESS, District Judge.

As the solution of this question does not depend upon any statutory provision, and, as a precedent, is of consequence to the profession and the public, before concurring with the register, I have given to the subject mature consideration. I have arrived at the conclusion that his opinion is based on sound principles, and sustained by sufficient authority. The fund is within the control of the court, and it is our province so. to administer it as to do exact justice to all the creditors. We have judicial knowledge of the professional services rendered by the able counsel of the petitioning creditors, by whose exertions the fund has been realized; and, as we consider the fee charged reasonable, it is proper that their compensation, as one of the incidental expenses, should be deducted before distribution. The decision of the register is affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.